Reaction to a critical situation during driving with Adaptive Cruise Control for users and non-users of the system. (February 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Reaction to a critical situation during driving with Adaptive Cruise Control for users and non-users of the system. (February 2015)
- Main Title:
- Reaction to a critical situation during driving with Adaptive Cruise Control for users and non-users of the system
- Authors:
- Bianchi Piccinini, Giulio Francesco
Rodrigues, Carlos Manuel
Leitão, Miguel
Simões, Anabela - Abstract:
- Highlights: Negative behavioural adaptations to ACC were observed during system's failure. The ACC users' mental model of the system influences the reaction to ACC failure. The driver's trust in ACC does not have an effect on the reaction to ACC failure. The mental model of ACC became more accurate after experiencing ACC failure. The driver's trust in ACC did not change after experiencing ACC failure. Abstract: Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) is a system that maintains driver-selected speed and headway to a preceding vehicle. The system presents some limitations that are, in part or totally, unknown to the users. Hence, many drivers exhibit a rudimentary mental model of the system and place excessive trust in the device. As a consequence, negative effects on road safety can easily occur. However, to date, many studies conducted on ACC have comprised participants who had never used ACC previously. Therefore, there is limited knowledge of how ACC affects the driving performance of experienced users of the system. To shed light on this point, twenty-six participants, divided into two groups (ACC users and non-users) drove twice in the simulated environment (once with the ACC and once manually). During both drives, the participants experienced a critical situation (stationary vehicle stopped in the cruising lane of the highway). The results show that negative behavioural adaptations to the ACC resulted from the usage of the system with regard to the critical situation: the risk ofHighlights: Negative behavioural adaptations to ACC were observed during system's failure. The ACC users' mental model of the system influences the reaction to ACC failure. The driver's trust in ACC does not have an effect on the reaction to ACC failure. The mental model of ACC became more accurate after experiencing ACC failure. The driver's trust in ACC did not change after experiencing ACC failure. Abstract: Adaptive Cruise Control (ACC) is a system that maintains driver-selected speed and headway to a preceding vehicle. The system presents some limitations that are, in part or totally, unknown to the users. Hence, many drivers exhibit a rudimentary mental model of the system and place excessive trust in the device. As a consequence, negative effects on road safety can easily occur. However, to date, many studies conducted on ACC have comprised participants who had never used ACC previously. Therefore, there is limited knowledge of how ACC affects the driving performance of experienced users of the system. To shed light on this point, twenty-six participants, divided into two groups (ACC users and non-users) drove twice in the simulated environment (once with the ACC and once manually). During both drives, the participants experienced a critical situation (stationary vehicle stopped in the cruising lane of the highway). The results show that negative behavioural adaptations to the ACC resulted from the usage of the system with regard to the critical situation: the risk of collision during the driving with ACC was increased compared with the manual driving for both groups of drivers. Besides, the research stresses the negative large correlation between the driver's mental model of ACC operation in the critical situation and the safety margins maintained by the ACC users during the same situation. Finally, it was found that the drivers' trust in the system does not have an influence on the drivers' behaviour during the trial with the ACC. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Safety science. Volume 72(2015)
- Journal:
- Safety science
- Issue:
- Volume 72(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 72, Issue 2015 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 72
- Issue:
- 2015
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0072-2015-0000
- Page Start:
- 116
- Page End:
- 126
- Publication Date:
- 2015-02
- Subjects:
- Human factors -- Driving simulator -- Mental model -- Trust -- Behavioural adaptation
Industrial accidents -- Periodicals
Accident Prevention -- Periodicals
Safety -- Periodicals
Travail -- Accidents -- Périodiques
363.11 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09257535 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/safety-science/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.09.008 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0925-7535
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 8069.124900
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14565.xml