Lengthening Less Than 7 Months Leads to Greater Spinal Height Gain With Rib-based Distraction. Issue 8 (September 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Qiu, Catherine; Lott, Carina; Agaba, Perez; Cahill, Patrick J.; Anari, Jason B.
• Is Part Of: Journal of pediatric orthopaedics. Volume 40:Issue 8(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-09
• Subjects: early-onset scoliosis -- EOS -- scoliosis -- spine -- neuromuscular -- congenital -- thoracic insufficiency syndrome -- rib-based growing instrumentation -- distraction frequency; Pediatric orthopedics -- Periodicals; 618.927
• DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001625
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0271-6798

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Severe early-onset scoliosis (EOS) has been associated with a multitude of comorbidities, chief among them being deficient thoracic spine growth and pulmonary complications. EOS management with rib-based instrumentation involves repeated lengthening. Despite expansion practice patterns, there is limited literature and no evidence-based guidelines for optimal expansion intervals. Our study evaluates clinical outcomes in relation to lengthening intervals with the aim of optimizing the timing of surgical expansion in EOS patients. Methods: A single-institution retrospective review of 60 EOS patients treated with rib-based growth instrumentation with a minimum of 3-year follow-up and 3 expansion/revision surgeries. Patients were separated into 2 expansion cohorts: (1) more frequent lengthening [MFL group (⩽7 mo)] and (2) less frequent lengthening [LFL group (>7 mo)]. Demographic information and clinical factors were recorded. Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed. Results: Both the MFL group (35 patients) and LFL group (25 patients) were similar in sex distribution, diagnosis, preoperative parameters of interest, and treatment duration. The mean follow-up was 6.0 years. There was an increase in postoperative T1-S1 spine height gained in the MFL group ( P =0.006) as well as a higher percent expected spine growth based on normative values ( P= 0.03) when compared with the LFL group. The MFL group had more expansion/revision surgeries ( P =0.003) but no increase in the number of complications ( P =0.86). Conclusions: More frequent lengthenings were associated with statistically significant overall spinal height gain and percent expected growth without a significant increase in complication rates. It was shown that change in major curve and space available for the lungs was not associated with the lengthening intervals. Level of Evidence: Level III—a comparative retrospective study.