Disparities in Burnout and Satisfaction With Work–Life Integration in U.S. Physicians by Gender and Practice Setting. (September 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Disparities in Burnout and Satisfaction With Work–Life Integration in U.S. Physicians by Gender and Practice Setting. (September 2020)
- Main Title:
- Disparities in Burnout and Satisfaction With Work–Life Integration in U.S. Physicians by Gender and Practice Setting
- Authors:
- Marshall, Ariela L.
Dyrbye, Liselotte N.
Shanafelt, Tait D.
Sinsky, Christine A.
Satele, Daniel
Trockel, Mickey
Tutty, Michael
West, Colin P. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Purpose: To explore the interaction between practice setting (academic practice [AP], private practice [PP]) and gender in relation to physician burnout and satisfaction with work–life integration (WLI). Method: In 2017, the authors administered a cross-sectional survey of U.S. physicians and characterized rates of burnout and satisfaction with WLI using previously validated and/or standardized tools. They conducted multivariable logistic regression to determine the interaction between the included variables. Results: Of the 3, 603 participants in the final analysis, female physicians reported a higher prevalence of burnout than male physicians in both AP (50.7% vs 38.2%, P < .0001) and PP (48.1% vs 40.7%, P = .001). However, the multivariable analysis found no statistically significant gender-based differences in burnout (odds ratio [OR] 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76–1.17, P = .60). Women and men in AP were less likely to report burnout than men in PP (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52–0.94, P = .01 and OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53–0.90, P < .01, respectively); women in PP did not report different burnout rates from men in PP (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.68–1.16, P = .38). Women in both AP and PP were less likely to be satisfied with WLI than men in PP (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.47–0.83, P < .01 and OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58–0.97, P = .03, respectively); men in AP did not report different satisfaction with WLI than men in PP (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.82–1.33, P = .71). Conclusions: Gender differences inAbstract : Purpose: To explore the interaction between practice setting (academic practice [AP], private practice [PP]) and gender in relation to physician burnout and satisfaction with work–life integration (WLI). Method: In 2017, the authors administered a cross-sectional survey of U.S. physicians and characterized rates of burnout and satisfaction with WLI using previously validated and/or standardized tools. They conducted multivariable logistic regression to determine the interaction between the included variables. Results: Of the 3, 603 participants in the final analysis, female physicians reported a higher prevalence of burnout than male physicians in both AP (50.7% vs 38.2%, P < .0001) and PP (48.1% vs 40.7%, P = .001). However, the multivariable analysis found no statistically significant gender-based differences in burnout (odds ratio [OR] 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76–1.17, P = .60). Women and men in AP were less likely to report burnout than men in PP (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52–0.94, P = .01 and OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.53–0.90, P < .01, respectively); women in PP did not report different burnout rates from men in PP (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.68–1.16, P = .38). Women in both AP and PP were less likely to be satisfied with WLI than men in PP (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.47–0.83, P < .01 and OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58–0.97, P = .03, respectively); men in AP did not report different satisfaction with WLI than men in PP (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.82–1.33, P = .71). Conclusions: Gender differences in rates of burnout are related to practice setting and other differences in physicians' personal and professional lives. These results highlight the complex relationships among gender, practice setting, and other personal and professional factors in their influence on burnout and satisfaction with WLI. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Academic medicine. Volume 95:Number 9(2020)
- Journal:
- Academic medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 95:Number 9(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 95, Issue 9 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 95
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0095-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-09
- Subjects:
- Medical education -- Periodicals
Medical policy -- Periodicals
Medical personnel -- Periodicals
Periodicals
610.711 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00001888-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.academicmedicine.org ↗
http://www.academicmedicine.org/contents-by-date.0.shtml ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003521 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1040-2446
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0570.513500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14527.xml