Pediatric Patient Surge: Evaluation of an Alternate Care Site Quality Improvement Initiative. Issue 5 (September 2020) - De Leon, Eric
Abstract : Background: Pediatric Level I trauma centers often experience patient volume surges. The increase stresses the emergency department, and usual patient care areas become inadequate. The purpose of this quality improvement study is to describe the implementation and analysis of an alternate care site to facilitate patient flow during seasonal patient volume surges. Methods: This initiative used a nonequivalent historical control group posttest-only design. An alternate care site was selected because of its size, temporary nature, low cost, and proximity to the emergency department. The alternate care site was activated between January and March 2019 using the following criteria: the total number of patients in waiting room 30 or more and wait times 2.5 hr or more. Outcome metrics include total census, length of stay—admissions, length of stay—discharges, left without being seen, hours per patient visit, patient satisfaction scores, and process metrics. Descriptive statistics and t tests were used to determine differences between groups. Results: A total of 180 patients were analyzed with n = 90 from 2018 and n = 90 from 2019. The alternate care site was activated five times over one season. The alternate care site decreased median waiting times, length of stay—admissions, length of stay—discharges, and left without being seen as compared with the previous year. Hours per patient visit and patient satisfaction scores remained constant as compared with the previous year. Conclusions: The creation of an alternate care site within the emergency department allowed quick mobilization, response, and treatment of patients. The alternate care site decreased median length of stay for admissions, discharges, and who left without being seen while keeping hours per patient visit and patient satisfaction constant. Future studies should confirm findings by testing the alternate care site in other hospitals and settings and should consider formally evaluating staff satisfaction.