Applying the Eosinophilic Esophagitis Endoscopic Reference Scores (EREFS) to Different Aged Children. Issue 3 (September 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ahuja, Neha; Weedon, Jeremy; Schwarz, Steven M.; Sklar, Rachel; Rabinowitz, Simon S.
• Is Part Of: Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. Volume 71:Issue 3(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-09
• Subjects: endoscopic reference score -- eosinophilic esophagitis -- negative predictive value -- pediatrics; Children -- Nutrition -- Periodicals; Pediatric gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Infants -- Nutrition -- Periodicals; Nutrition disorders in children -- Periodicals; Child Nutrition -- Periodicals; Digestive System -- growth & development -- Periodicals; Gastrointestinal Diseases -- Periodicals; Infant Nutrition -- Periodicals; Nutrition Disorders -- Periodicals; Child; 618.923
• DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002788
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0277-2116

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Objectives: The eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) endoscopic reference score (EREFS) was developed to analyze adults with EoE and has been successfully applied to a pediatric cohort. The present study compares EREFS in younger and older children with EoE. Methods: The 99 patients were divided among 3 cohorts: 44 active EoE (EoE-A); 16 EoE remission (EoE-R); and 39 controls (esophageal dysfunction but <15 eos/hpf). The cohorts were then subdivided into 2 groups: younger (⩽10 years) and older (>10 years) that were compared based on the composite and the individual components of their EREFS. Results: EREFS identified EoE-A in all children with an area under the receiving operating characteristics curve (AUC) of 0.85, in older children with an AUC of 0.90 and in younger children with an AUC of 0.77. Mean EREFS for ⩽10 years was 1.26 ± 1.19 and 2.71 ± 1.33 for >10 years ( P < 0.01). The 3 most common findings in our entire EoE-A cohort and in both ages were furrows, edema, and exudates. EREFS in patients with EoE-A had similar specificities (0.88 vs 0.89) and positive predictive values (0.89 vs 0.91) in both ages. Conclusions: The present investigation confirms the utilization of EREFS in Pediatric EoE. Furthermore, EREFS can detect EoE and document response to treatment in both younger and older children. EREFS, however, predicted EoE in the older children with a higher sensitivity (0.89 vs 0.63) and a higher negative predictive value (0.87 vs 0.59) than was seen in the younger cohort.