Development of consensus on models of care in adults with intestinal failure using a modified Delphi approach. Issue 9 (1st April 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Carey, Sharon; Kalachov, Michelle; Jones, Lynn; Koh, Cherry
• Is Part Of: Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology. Volume 33:Issue 9(2018)
• Page Start: 1598
• Page End: 1602
• Publication Date: 2018-04-01
• Subjects: Delphi methodology -- home parenteral nutrition -- intestinal failure -- models of care; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Digestive organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Liver -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Liver Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.33
• DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14132
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0815-9319

Abstract

Abstract: Background and Aim: The aims of this study were to establish consensus on service delivery models for management of Type III intestinal failure (IF) and home parenteral nutrition (HPN) within the Australian health‐care system and to identify barriers and enablers in moving towards this ideal model. Methods: A modified Delphi methodology was utilized to survey experts working in Type III IF HPN. The panel comprised physicians, dietitians, nurses, and pharmacists from 18 of the 20 adult Type III IF HPN centres across Australia. The study consisted of two rounds of email administered questionnaires developed around four key areas of health service delivery: access to services, clinical care, service guidance, and models of care. Open‐ended responses were evaluated via an inductive thematic approach to identify areas of consensus. Experts reviewed the final report to consolidate consensus and validity. Results: There was >80% consensus that an ideal team should consist of a physician, nurse, dietitian, pharmacist, and access to psychological support. Consensus supported the need for updated guidelines (75%) and a hub and spoke model of care (82%). However, further consultation is required in order to establish consensus around the use of HPN in the palliative oncology setting (69%). Conclusions: This consensus provides a framework within which health professionals, managers, policy‐makers, and consumer groups can move towards optimal management for Type III IF HPN patients. Advocacy and a review of service delivery across Australia are now required to facilitate the ideal model of care identified.