Dosimetric accuracy of proton therapy for chordoma patients with titanium implants. Issue 7 (25th June 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Verburg, Joost M.; Seco, Joao
• Is Part Of: Medical physics. Volume 40:Issue 7(2013)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2013-06-25
• Subjects: Dose‐volume analysis -- Monte Carlo methods -- Computed tomography; biomedical materials -- computerised tomography -- dosimetry -- Monte Carlo methods -- phantoms -- prosthetics -- radiation therapy -- titanium -- tumours; proton therapy -- radiation therapy -- cancer -- chordoma -- implants -- computed tomography -- metal artifacts -- metal artifact reduction -- Monte Carlo methods -- dosimetry -- treatment planning; Computerised tomographs -- Prostheses implantable into the body -- Radiation therapy; Titanium -- Protons -- Computed tomography -- Dosimetry -- Monte Carlo methods -- Proton therapy -- Multiple scattering -- Medical imaging -- Collisional energy loss -- Medical image artifacts; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Medical physics; Geneeskunde; Natuurkunde; Toepassingen; Biophysics; Periodicals; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1118/1.4810942
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-2405

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: : To investigate dosimetric errors in proton therapy treatment planning due to titanium implants, and to determine how these affect postoperative passively scattered proton therapy for chordoma patients with orthopedic hardware. Methods: : The presence of titanium hardware near the tumor may affect the dosimetric accuracy of proton therapy. Artifacts in the computed tomography (CT) scan can cause errors in the proton stopping powers used for dose calculation, which are derived from CT numbers. Also, clinical dose calculation algorithms may not accurately simulate proton beam transport through the implants, which have very different properties as compared to human tissue. The authors first evaluated the impact of these two main issues. Dose errors introduced by metal artifacts were studied using phantoms with and without titanium inserts, and patient scans on which a metal artifact reduction method was applied. Pencil‐beam dose calculations were compared to models of nuclear interactions in titanium and Monte Carlo simulations. Then, to assess the overall impact on treatment plans for chordoma, the authors compared the original clinical treatment plans to recalculated dose distributions employing both metal artifact reduction and Monte Carlo methods. Results: : Dose recalculations of clinical proton fields showed that metal artifacts cause range errors up to 6 mm distal to regions affected by CT artifacts. Monte Carlo simulations revealed dose differences >10% in the high‐dose area, and range differences up to 10 mm. Since these errors are mostly local in nature, the large number of fields limits the impact on target coverage in the chordoma treatment plans to a small decrease of dose homogeneity. Conclusions: : In the presence of titanium implants, CT metal artifacts and the approximations of pencil‐beam dose calculations cause considerable errors in proton dose calculation. The spatial distribution of the errors however limits the overall impact on passively scattered proton therapy for chordoma.