Effects of iodine methionine on boar sperm quality during liquid storage at 17°C. (9th July 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fang, Q; Wang, J; Hao, YY; Li, H; Hu, JX; Yang, GS; Hu, JH
• Is Part Of: Reproduction in domestic animals. Volume 52:Number 6(2017)
• Page Start: 1061
• Page End: 1066
• Publication Date: 2017-07-09
• Subjects: antibacterial effect -- boar -- fertility -- iodine methionine -- spermatozoa; Animal breeding -- Periodicals; Veterinary pathology -- Periodicals; Livestock -- Breeding -- Periodicals; 636.082
• DOI: 10.1111/rda.13024
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0936-6768

Abstract

Contents: Microbial environment is one of the important factors that affect the quality of preserved semen. Iodine methionine (IM), participating in the production and activation of metabolic enzymes, is a new type of amino acid chelate. To date, there has been no report to evaluate the effects of IM on boar semen preservation at 17°C. This study was designed to investigate the effects of IM on boar sperm quality and reproductive performance during liquid storage at 17°C and its antibacterial effect. Semen samples collected from six Yorkshire boars were diluted with basic liquid containing different concentrations of IM (0, 20, 40, 80, 160 and 320 μM). Subsequently, sperm motility, plasma membrane integrity and acrosome integrity were determined. After 6 days of preservation, the difference in microbial composition between control group and 80 μM IM group was compared using 16S rDNA sequencing, and the effects of IM on reproductive performance were also compared and analysed between the two groups. The results demonstrated that 20, 40 and 80 μM IM improved boar sperm motility, plasma membrane integrity and acrosome integrity. 80 μM IM was the optimum concentration. Conversely, 160 and 320 μM IM resulted in deleterious consequences to boar sperm quality compared to the control group and other treatment groups ( p < .05). After 6 days of preservation, sperm motility, plasma membrane integrity and acrosome integrity were 56.0%, 51.8% and 59.4%, respectively. There was no significant difference in non‐return rate between the two groups ( p > .05). But the litter size of 80 μM IM group was significantly higher than that of control group ( p < .05). 80 μM IM inhibited proliferation of the phylum Proteobacteria and the genus Staphylococcus as well as Pseudomonas ( p < .05). Further studies are required to understand the antibacterial mechanism of IM in liquid‐preserved boar semen.