Epidemiological Differences Between Localized and Nonlocalized Low Back Pain. Issue 10 (15th May 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Epidemiological Differences Between Localized and Nonlocalized Low Back Pain. Issue 10 (15th May 2017)
- Main Title:
- Epidemiological Differences Between Localized and Nonlocalized Low Back Pain
- Authors:
- Coggon, David
Ntani, Georgia
Walker-Bone, Karen
Palmer, Keith T.
Felli, Vanda E.
Harari, Raul
Barrero, Lope H.
Felknor, Sarah A.
Gimeno, David
Cattrell, Anna
Vargas-Prada, Sergio
Bonzini, Matteo
Solidaki, Eleni
Merisalu, Eda
Habib, Rima R.
Sadeghian, Farideh
Kadir, M. Masood
Warnakulasuriya, Sudath SP
Matsudaira, Ko
Nyantumbu, Busisiwe
Sim, Malcolm R.
Harcombe, Helen
Cox, Ken
Sarquis, Leila M.M.
Marziale, Maria H.
Harari, Florencia
Freire, Rocio
Harari, Natalia
Monroy, Magda V.
Quintana, Leonardo A.
Rojas, Marianela
Harris, Elizabeth Clare
Serra, Consol
Martinez, José Miguel
Delclos, George
Benavides, Fernando G.
Carugno, Michele
Ferrario, Marco M.
Pesatori, Angela C.
Chatzi, Leda
Bitsios, Panos
Kogevinas, Manolis
Oha, Kristel
Freimann, Tiina
Sadeghian, Ali
Peiris-John, Roshini J.
Sathiakumar, Nalini
Wickremasinghe, A. Rajitha
Yoshimura, Noriko
Kelsall, Helen L.
Hoe, Victor C.W.
Urquhart, Donna M.
Derrett, Sarah
McBride, David
Herbison, Peter
Gray, Andrew
Salazar Vega, Eduardo J.
… (more) - Abstract:
- Abstract : Study Design: A cross-sectional survey with a longitudinal follow-up. Objectives: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that pain, which is localized to the low back, differs epidemiologically from that which occurs simultaneously or close in time to pain at other anatomical sites Summary of Background Data: Low back pain (LBP) often occurs in combination with other regional pain, with which it shares similar psychological and psychosocial risk factors. However, few previous epidemiological studies of LBP have distinguished pain that is confined to the low back from that which occurs as part of a wider distribution of pain. Methods: We analyzed data from CUPID, a cohort study that used baseline and follow-up questionnaires to collect information about musculoskeletal pain, associated disability, and potential risk factors, in 47 occupational groups (office workers, nurses, and others) from 18 countries. Results: Among 12, 197 subjects at baseline, 609 (4.9%) reported localized LBP in the past month, and 3820 (31.3%) nonlocalized LBP. Nonlocalized LBP was more frequently associated with sciatica in the past month (48.1% vs . 30.0% of cases), occurred on more days in the past month and past year, was more often disabling for everyday activities (64.1% vs . 47.3% of cases), and had more frequently led to medical consultation and sickness absence from work. It was also more often persistent when participants were followed up after a mean of 14 months (65.6%Abstract : Study Design: A cross-sectional survey with a longitudinal follow-up. Objectives: The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that pain, which is localized to the low back, differs epidemiologically from that which occurs simultaneously or close in time to pain at other anatomical sites Summary of Background Data: Low back pain (LBP) often occurs in combination with other regional pain, with which it shares similar psychological and psychosocial risk factors. However, few previous epidemiological studies of LBP have distinguished pain that is confined to the low back from that which occurs as part of a wider distribution of pain. Methods: We analyzed data from CUPID, a cohort study that used baseline and follow-up questionnaires to collect information about musculoskeletal pain, associated disability, and potential risk factors, in 47 occupational groups (office workers, nurses, and others) from 18 countries. Results: Among 12, 197 subjects at baseline, 609 (4.9%) reported localized LBP in the past month, and 3820 (31.3%) nonlocalized LBP. Nonlocalized LBP was more frequently associated with sciatica in the past month (48.1% vs . 30.0% of cases), occurred on more days in the past month and past year, was more often disabling for everyday activities (64.1% vs . 47.3% of cases), and had more frequently led to medical consultation and sickness absence from work. It was also more often persistent when participants were followed up after a mean of 14 months (65.6% vs . 54.1% of cases). In adjusted Poisson regression analyses, nonlocalized LBP was differentially associated with risk factors, particularly female sex, older age, and somatizing tendency. There were also marked differences in the relative prevalence of localized and nonlocalized LBP by occupational group. Conclusion: Future epidemiological studies should distinguish where possible between pain that is limited to the low back and LBP that occurs in association with pain at other anatomical locations. Level of Evidence: 2 … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Spine. Volume 42:Issue 10(2017)
- Journal:
- Spine
- Issue:
- Volume 42:Issue 10(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 42, Issue 10 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 42
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0042-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2017-05-15
- Subjects:
- diagnostic classification -- disability -- epidemiology -- low back pain -- medical consultation -- occupation -- prognosis -- risk factors -- sciatica -- sickness absence -- somatizing
Spine -- Abnormalities -- Periodicals
Spine -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Spine -- Surgery -- Periodicals
616.73005 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&NEWS=n&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00007632-000000000-00000 ↗
http://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://www.spinejournal.com/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001956 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0362-2436
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 8413.903000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14498.xml