Developing an ethics-based approach to indicators of sustainable agriculture using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). (January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Veisi, Hadi; Liaghati, Houman; Alipour, Ali
• Is Part Of: Ecological indicators. Volume 60(2016)
• Page Start: 644
• Page End: 654
• Publication Date: 2016-01
• Subjects: Sustainable agriculture -- Ethics -- Indicators -- Utilitarian -- Rights -- Virtue -- Analytic hierarchy process; Environmental monitoring -- Periodicals; Environmental management -- Periodicals; Environmental impact analysis -- Periodicals; Environmental risk assessment -- Periodicals; Sustainable development -- Periodicals; 333.71405
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.012
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1470-160X

Abstract

Highlights: The analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was employed to determine the strategies and ethics of sustainability in agriculture and food systems in Iran. Three ethical approaches were compared with respect to indicators of sustainable agriculture. Virtue-, rights-, and utilitarian-based ethical models have successive levels of priority for sustainable agricultural development. Information and structural strategies are recommended to integrate different ethical perspectives into a macroethics approach. Abstract: This study was conducted to determine the strategies and ethics of sustainability in agriculture and food systems in Iran. To represent the points of view of 57 agricultural stockholders, including an ago-ecologist specialist, agricultural extension and development experts, farmers, and the Iranian Scientific Society of Agroecology (ISSA) members, the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) was employed. A hierarchical network was developed at two levels for selection from among the three ethical approaches, which were developed based on the general tenets of utilitarian, rights, and virtue models. The findings indicated that criteria, i.e. resilience of agricultural systems, supportive policies and self-reliance, and equity, are the most important criteria for sustainable agriculture (SA) in Iran. A sensitivity analysis was carried out to determine the critical factors affecting the priority of alternatives. The results indicated that virtue, rights, and utilitarian models have successive levels of priority as the theoretical base of sustainable agricultural development in Iran. Finally, we outline two strategies for developing a macroethics approach: informational strategies to consider the priorities of virtue model, and structural strategies to highlight the reinforcing nature of right model and utilitarian model.