Discriminating Agonist from Antagonist Ligands of the Nuclear Receptors Using Different Chemoinformatics Approaches. Issue 10 (3rd July 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lagarde, Nathalie; Delahaye, Solenne; Jérémie, Aurore; Ben Nasr, Nesrine; Guillemain, Hélène; Empereur‐mot, Charly; Laville, Vincent; Labib, Taoufik; Réau, Manon; Langenfeld, Florent; Zagury, Jean‐François; Montes, Matthieu
• Is Part Of: Molecular informatics. Volume 36:Issue 10(2017)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2017-07-03
• Subjects: Nuclear receptors -- Agonist ligands -- Antagonist ligands -- Descriptors -- Docking -- Pharmacophores -- Virtual screening; Cheminformatics -- Periodicals; QSAR (Biochemistry) -- Periodicals; Structure-activity relationships (Biochemistry) -- Periodicals; Drugs -- Structure-activity relationships -- Periodicals; 615.19
• DOI: 10.1002/minf.201700020
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1868-1743

Abstract

Abstract: Nuclear receptors (NRs) constitute an important class of therapeutic targets. During the last 4 years, we tackled the pharmacological profile assessment of NR ligands for which we constructed the NRLiSt BDB. We evaluated and compared the performance of different virtual screening approaches: mean of molecular descriptor distribution values, molecular docking and 3D pharmacophore models. The simple comparison of the distribution profiles of 4885 molecular descriptors between the agonist and antagonist datasets didn′t provide satisfying results. We obtained an overall good performance with the docking method we used, Surflex‐Dock which was able to discriminate agonist from antagonist ligands. But the availability of PDB structures in the "pharmacological‐profile‐to‐predict‐bound‐state" (agonist‐bound or antagonist‐bound) and the availability of enough ligands of both pharmacological profiles constituted limits to generalize this protocol for all NRs. Finally, the 3D pharmacophore modeling approach, allowed us to generate selective agonist pharmacophores and selective antagonist pharmacophores that covered more than 99 % of the whole NRLiSt BDB. This study allowed a better understanding of the pharmacological modulation of NRs with small molecules and could be extended to other therapeutic classes. Abstract :