A comparison of the persistence, toxicity, and exposure to high-volume natural plant-derived and synthetic pesticides. (16th July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Smith, Carr J; Perfetti, Thomas A
• Is Part Of: Toxicology research and application. Volume 4(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-07-16
• Subjects: Natural plant pesticides -- synthetic pesticides -- persistence -- Ames mutagenicity -- rodent carcinogenicity -- developmental toxicity; Toxicology -- Periodicals; 571.9505
• DOI: 10.1177/2397847320940561
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2397-8473

Abstract

The immobility of plants exerted evolutionary selection pressures resulting in the production of thousands of chemical substances thought to function as pesticides against predation by insects and animals. More than 10, 000 plant-derived compounds have been isolated with the existence of about 100, 000 such compounds postulated. In 1990, Ames et al. reported that 99.99% by weight of the pesticides ingested in a normal human diet are derived from natural plant-based sources. This surprising result raised the question as to whether these natural plant pesticides were toxic to humans. These authors examined a relatively small subset of natural pesticides and determined that their tumorigenicity in rodent cancer bioassays was similar to synthetic pesticides. In this analysis, we used standard United States Environmental Protection Agency programs to estimate the toxicity (T.E.S.T. 4.2) and persistence (EPI Suite 4.1) of a series of high-volume synthetic and natural pesticides. On average, synthetic pesticides were more persistent in the environment than were natural pesticides. This result is consistent with cost, time, and logistical constraints under which farmers apply a limited number of applications of pesticides during a crop cycle. Synthetic and natural pesticides are predicted to possess toxicities including mutagenicity and developmental toxicity. Synthetic pesticides are less often mutagenic.