Adult Asthma Diagnosis: Physician Reported Challenges in Alberta-Based Primary Care Practices. (May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sharpe, H.; Claveria-Gonzalez, F. C.; Davidson, W.; Befus, A. D.; Leung, J. P.; Young, E.; Walker, B.
• Is Part Of: SAGE open nursing. Volume 6(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-05
• Subjects: asthma -- chronic illnesses -- diagnostics -- practice -- primary care -- pulmonary; Nursing -- Periodicals; 610.7305
• DOI: 10.1177/2377960820925984
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2377-9608

Abstract

Introduction: An estimated 8.1% of Canadians adults have asthma. While there are challenges associated with the use of objective measurement of lung function in the diagnosis of asthma, we are uncertain of the barriers that impact the use of objective measures, and have limited understanding of the challenges experienced by primary care providers in diagnosis of asthma. The objectives of this quality improvement initiative were to identify primary care providers' methods of diagnosing asthma and to identify challenges with diagnosis. Methods: An online survey was disseminated using a snowball methodology. Setting: Primary care practices in Alberta, Canada. Participants: A total of 84 primary care providers completed the survey. Main Outcome Measures: Participants were asked their ideal and sufficient methods for diagnosing asthma and to identify challenges in their practice related to asthma diagnosis. Results: They identified full pulmonary function testing (54%), pre- and postbronchodilator spirometry (54%), complete history and physical (42%), peak flow measurement overtime (26%), pulmonary consult (26%), and trial of asthma medication(s) (23%), as ideal methods of diagnosing asthma. The most significant barriers to diagnosis included episodic care–care provided typically during times of worsening symptoms without ongoing preventative/maintenance care (55%), patient follow-up (44%), conflict between clinical impression and pulmonary function results (43%), patient already on asthma medications (43%), and interpreting spirometry/pulmonary function results (39%). Conclusion: The results of this survey indicate that the majority of primary care providers would choose full pulmonary function testing or pre- and postbronchodilator spirometry as the ideal methods of diagnosing asthma. However, barriers related to the nature of asthma care, patient factors, and challenges with diagnostic testing create challenges. This study also highlights that primary care providers have adapted to challenges in leveraging objective measurement and may rely upon other methods for diagnosis such as trials of medications.