Locally and remotely triggered aseismic slip on the central San Jacinto Fault near Anza, CA, from joint inversion of seismicity and strainmeter data. Issue 4 (27th April 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Inbal, A.; Ampuero, J.‐P.; Avouac, J.‐P.
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 122:Issue 4(2017)
• Page Start: 3033
• Page End: 3061
• Publication Date: 2017-04-27
• Subjects: seismogeodesy -- mechanics of faulting -- earthquake triggering -- transient deformation; Geomagnetism -- Periodicals; Geochemistry -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; Earth sciences -- Periodicals; 551.1
• DOI: 10.1002/2016JB013499
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-9313

Abstract

Abstract: We study deep aseismic slip along the central section of the San Jacinto Fault, near the Anza Seismic Gap, in southern California. Elevated strain rates following the remote M w 7.2, 4 April 2010 El Mayor‐Cucapah and the local M w 5.4, 7 July 2010 Collins Valley earthquakes were recorded by Plate Boundary Observatory borehole strainmeters near Anza and were accompanied by vigorous aftershock sequences. We introduce a method to infer the distribution of triggered aseismic slip from combined seismicity and geodetic data, based on a rate‐and‐state friction model that maps observed changes in seismicity rates into stress changes. We invert for the cumulative slip in the 10 day period following each main shock. Synthetic tests show that the effect of aftershock interactions on the inferred slip distribution is negligible. The joint data set is more consistent with a model in which aseismic slip on a principal fault triggers seismicity on adjacent faults than with one in which aseismic slip and seismicity are coplanar. Our results indicate that aseismic slip primarily occurs along the rim of two seismicity clusters adjacent to Anza Gap, as well as beneath the Anza Gap itself, at depths larger than 10 km. The triggered aseismic slip generated by the two main shocks has little overlap, a pattern also found in sequences of large earthquakes occurring on a same fault. Stresses inferred from seismic activity leading to the Collins Valley main shock suggest that this earthquake was triggered by stresses imposed by the El Mayor‐Cucapah remote‐triggered aseismic slip, which persisted for more than 2 months. Key Points: Strain and triggered seismicity in Anza are spatiotemporally correlated The M w 7.2 El Mayor‐Cucapah main shock triggered a several monthlong transient in Anza The M w 5.4 Collins Valley main shock was most likely triggered by aseismic slip induced by the remote El Mayor‐Cucapah main shock