Evaluating Patient-Centered Outcomes in Clinical Trials of Procedural Sedation, Part 1 Efficacy: Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research Recommendations. (March 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Evaluating Patient-Centered Outcomes in Clinical Trials of Procedural Sedation, Part 1 Efficacy: Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research Recommendations. (March 2017)
- Main Title:
- Evaluating Patient-Centered Outcomes in Clinical Trials of Procedural Sedation, Part 1 Efficacy
- Authors:
- Williams, Mark R.
Ward, Denham S.
Carlson, Douglas
Cravero, Joseph
Dexter, Franklin
Lightdale, Jenifer R.
Mason, Keira P.
Miner, James
Vargo, John J.
Berkenbosch, John W.
Clark, Randall M.
Constant, Isabelle
Dionne, Raymond
Dworkin, Robert H.
Gozal, David
Grayzel, David
Irwin, Michael G.
Lerman, Jerrold
O'Connor, Robert E.
Pandharipande, Pratik
Rappaport, Bob A.
Riker, Richard R.
Tobin, Joseph R.
Turk, Dennis C.
Twersky, Rebecca S.
Sessler, Daniel I. - Abstract:
- Abstract : The Sedation Consortium on Endpoints and Procedures for Treatment, Education, and Research, established by the Analgesic, Anesthetic, and Addiction Clinical Trial Translations, Innovations, Opportunities, and Networks public–private partnership with the US Food and Drug Administration, convened a meeting of sedation experts from a variety of clinical specialties and research backgrounds with the objective of developing recommendations for procedural sedation research. Four core outcome domains were recommended for consideration in sedation clinical trials: (1) safety, (2) efficacy, (3) patient-centered and/or family-centered outcomes, and (4) efficiency. This meeting identified core outcome measures within the efficacy and patient-centered and/or family-centered domains. Safety will be addressed in a subsequent meeting, and efficiency will not be addressed at this time. These measures encompass depth and levels of sedation, proceduralist and patient satisfaction, patient recall, and degree of pain experienced. Consistent use of the recommended outcome measures will facilitate the comprehensive reporting across sedation trials, along with meaningful comparisons among studies and interventions in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Abstract : Published ahead of print September 12, 2016.
- Is Part Of:
- Anesthesia & analgesia. Volume 124:Number 3(2017)
- Journal:
- Anesthesia & analgesia
- Issue:
- Volume 124:Number 3(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 124, Issue 3 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 124
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0124-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2017-03
- Subjects:
- Anesthesiology -- Periodicals
Anesthesia
Anesthesiology
Analgesia
Analgesics
Anesthesiology -- Periodicals
617.9605 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00000539-000000000-00000 ↗
http://journals.lww.com/anesthesia-analgesia/Pages/default.aspx ↗
http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001566 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-2999
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0900.500000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14512.xml