Diagnostic performance of virtual fractional flow reserve derived from routine coronary angiography using segmentation free reduced order (1-dimensional) flow modelling. (November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mohee, Kevin; Mynard, Jonathan P; Dhunnoo, Gauravsingh; Davies, Rhodri; Nithiarasu, Perumal; Halcox, Julian P; Obaid, Daniel R
• Is Part Of: JRSM cardiovascular disease. Volume 9(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-11
• Subjects: Coronary imaging: angiography/ultrasound/Doppler/CC -- catheter-based coronary interventions: stents -- cardiovascular imaging agents/techniques; Cardiovascular system -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.1005
• DOI: 10.1177/2048004020967578
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2048-0040

Abstract

Introduction: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) improves assessment of the physiological significance of coronary lesions compared with conventional angiography. However, it is an invasive investigation. We tested the performance of a virtual FFR (1D-vFFR) using routine angiographic images and a rapidly performed reduced order computational model. Methods: Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) was performed in 102 with coronary lesions assessed by invasive FFR. A 1D-vFFR for each lesion was created using reduced order (one-dimensional) computational flow modelling derived from conventional angiographic images and patient specific estimates of coronary flow. The diagnostic accuracy of 1D-vFFR and QCA derived stenosis was compared against the gold standard of invasive FFR using area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC). Results: QCA revealed the mean coronary stenosis diameter was 44% ± 12% and lesion length 13 ± 7 mm. Following angiography calculation of the 1DvFFR took less than one minute. Coronary stenosis (QCA) had a significant but weak correlation with FFR (r = −0.2, p = 0.04) and poor diagnostic performance to identify lesions with FFR <0.80 (AUC 0.39, p = 0.09), (sensitivity – 58% and specificity – 26% at a QCA stenosis of 50%). In contrast, 1D-vFFR had a better correlation with FFR (r = 0.32, p = 0.01) and significantly better diagnostic performance (AUC 0.67, p = 0.007), (sensitivity – 92% and specificity - 29% at a 1D-vFFR of 0.7). Conclusions: 1D-vFFR improves the determination of functionally significant coronary lesions compared with conventional angiography without requiring a pressure-wire or hyperaemia induction. It is fast enough to influence immediate clinical decision-making but requires further clinical evaluation.