Comparison of conventional and rapid-acting antidepressants in a rodent probabilistic reversal learning task. (February 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wilkinson, Matthew P.; Grogan, John P.; Mellor, Jack R.; Robinson, Emma S. J.
• Is Part Of: Brain and neuroscience advances. Volume 4(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-02
• Subjects: Antidepressants -- major depressive disorder -- probabilistic reversal learning -- ketamine -- cognitive flexibility -- Q-learning -- feedback sensitivity -- citalopram; Brain -- Periodicals; Neurosciences -- Periodicals; Brain; Nervous System; Brain; Neurosciences; Periodicals; Periodical; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1177/2398212820907177
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2398-2128

Abstract

Deficits in reward processing are a central feature of major depressive disorder with patients exhibiting decreased reward learning and altered feedback sensitivity in probabilistic reversal learning tasks. Methods to quantify probabilistic learning in both rodents and humans have been developed, providing translational paradigms for depression research. We have utilised a probabilistic reversal learning task to investigate potential differences between conventional and rapid-acting antidepressants on reward learning and feedback sensitivity. We trained 12 rats in a touchscreen probabilistic reversal learning task before investigating the effect of acute administration of citalopram, venlafaxine, reboxetine, ketamine or scopolamine. Data were also analysed using a Q-learning reinforcement learning model to understand the effects of antidepressant treatment on underlying reward processing parameters. Citalopram administration decreased trials taken to learn the first rule and increased win-stay probability. Reboxetine decreased win-stay behaviour while also decreasing the number of rule changes animals performed in a session. Venlafaxine had no effect. Ketamine and scopolamine both decreased win-stay probability, number of rule changes performed and motivation in the task. Insights from the reinforcement learning model suggested that reboxetine led animals to choose a less optimal strategy, while ketamine decreased the model-free learning rate. These results suggest that reward learning and feedback sensitivity are not differentially modulated by conventional and rapid-acting antidepressant treatment in the probabilistic reversal learning task.