Risk stratifying emergency department patients with acute pulmonary embolism: Does the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index perform as well as the original?. Issue 148 (December 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Risk stratifying emergency department patients with acute pulmonary embolism: Does the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index perform as well as the original?. Issue 148 (December 2016)
- Main Title:
- Risk stratifying emergency department patients with acute pulmonary embolism: Does the simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index perform as well as the original?
- Authors:
- Vinson, David R.
Ballard, Dustin W.
Mark, Dustin G.
Huang, Jie
Reed, Mary E.
Rauchwerger, Adina S.
Wang, David H.
Lin, James S.
Kene, Mamata V.
Pleshakov, Tamara S.
Sax, Dana K.
Sax, Jordan M.
McLachlan, D. Ian
Yamin, Cyrus K.
Swap, Clifford J.
Iskin, Hilary R.
Vemula, Ridhima
Fleming, Bethany S.
Elms, Andrew R.
Aujesky, Drahomir - Abstract:
- Abstract: Introduction: The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) is a validated prognostic score to estimate the 30-day mortality of emergency department (ED) patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). A simplified version (sPESI) was derived but has not been as well studied in the U.S. We sought to validate both indices in a community hospital setting in the U.S. and compare their performance in predicting 30-day all-cause mortality and classification of cases into low-risk and higher-risk categories. Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study included adults with acute objectively confirmed PE from 1/2013 to 4/2015 across 21 community EDs. We evaluated the misclassification rate of the sPESI compared with the PESI. We assessed accuracy of both indices with regard to 30-day mortality. Results: Among 3006 cases of acute PE, the 30-day all-cause mortality rate was 4.4%. The sPESI performed as well as the PESI in identifying low-risk patients: both had similar sensitivities, negative predictive values, and negative likelihood ratios. The sPESI, however, classified a smaller proportion of patients as low risk than the PESI (27.5% vs. 41.0%), but with similar low-risk mortality rates (< 1%). Compared with the PESI, the sPESI overclassified 443 low-risk patients (14.7%) as higher risk, yet their 30-day mortality was 0.7%. The sPESI underclassified 100 higher-risk patients (3.3%) as low risk who also had a low mortality rate (1.0%). Conclusions: Both indicesAbstract: Introduction: The Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) is a validated prognostic score to estimate the 30-day mortality of emergency department (ED) patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). A simplified version (sPESI) was derived but has not been as well studied in the U.S. We sought to validate both indices in a community hospital setting in the U.S. and compare their performance in predicting 30-day all-cause mortality and classification of cases into low-risk and higher-risk categories. Materials and methods: This retrospective cohort study included adults with acute objectively confirmed PE from 1/2013 to 4/2015 across 21 community EDs. We evaluated the misclassification rate of the sPESI compared with the PESI. We assessed accuracy of both indices with regard to 30-day mortality. Results: Among 3006 cases of acute PE, the 30-day all-cause mortality rate was 4.4%. The sPESI performed as well as the PESI in identifying low-risk patients: both had similar sensitivities, negative predictive values, and negative likelihood ratios. The sPESI, however, classified a smaller proportion of patients as low risk than the PESI (27.5% vs. 41.0%), but with similar low-risk mortality rates (< 1%). Compared with the PESI, the sPESI overclassified 443 low-risk patients (14.7%) as higher risk, yet their 30-day mortality was 0.7%. The sPESI underclassified 100 higher-risk patients (3.3%) as low risk who also had a low mortality rate (1.0%). Conclusions: Both indices identified patients with PE who were at low risk for 30-day mortality. The sPESI, however, misclassified a significant number of low-mortality patients as higher risk, which could lead to unnecessary hospitalizations. Highlights: The original and simplified PE Severity Indices accurately identify low-risk patients. Low-risk patients on both indices have 30-day all-cause mortality < 1%. The simplified Index misclassifies 15% of low-mortality patients as higher risk. Misclassification by the simplified Index could lead to unnecessary hospitalization. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Thrombosis research. Issue 148(2016)
- Journal:
- Thrombosis research
- Issue:
- Issue 148(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 148, Issue 148 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 148
- Issue:
- 148
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0148-0148-0000
- Page Start:
- 1
- Page End:
- 8
- Publication Date:
- 2016-12
- Subjects:
- PE pulmonary embolism -- PESI Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index -- sPESI simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index -- ED emergency department -- MAPLE management of acute pulmonary embolism -- KP Kaiser Permanente -- ICD International Classification of Disease -- CPT® Current Procedural Terminology -- VTE venous thromboembolism -- DVT deep venous thrombosis
Pulmonary embolism -- Risk assessment -- Severity of illness index -- Clinical prediction rule -- Prognosis -- Decision support techniques
Thrombosis -- Periodicals
616.135 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00493848 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.09.023 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0049-3848
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 8820.365000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14490.xml