Emotion and false memory: How goal-irrelevance can be relevant for what people remember. Issue 2 (7th February 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Van Damme, Ilse; Kaplan, Robin L.; Levine, Linda J.; Loftus, Elizabeth F.
• Is Part Of: Memory. Volume 25:Issue 2(2017)
• Page Start: 201
• Page End: 213
• Publication Date: 2017-02-07
• Subjects: False memory -- emotion -- misinformation -- motivation -- valence -- goal-relevance; Memory -- Periodicals; 153.1205
• DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2016.1150489
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0965-8211

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Elaborating on misleading information concerning emotional events can lead people to form false memories. The present experiment compared participants' susceptibility to false memories when they elaborated on information associated with positive versus negative emotion and pregoal versus postgoal emotion. Pregoal emotion reflects appraisals that goal attainment or failure is anticipated but has not yet occurred (e.g., hope and fear). Postgoal emotion reflects appraisals that goal attainment or failure has already occurred (e.g., happiness and devastation). Participants watched a slideshow depicting an interaction between a couple and were asked to empathise with the protagonist's feelings of hope (positive pregoal), happiness (positive postgoal), fear (negative pregoal), or devastation (negative postgoal); in control conditions, no emotion was mentioned. Participants were then asked to reflect on details of the interaction that had occurred (true) or had not occurred (false), and that were relevant or irrelevant to the protagonist's goal. Irrespective of emotional valence, participants in the pregoal conditions were more susceptible to false memories concerning goal-irrelevant details than were participants in the other conditions. These findings support the view that pregoal emotions narrow attention to information relevant to goal pursuit, increasing susceptibility to false memories for irrelevant information.