Factors impacting upon timely and adequate allocation of prehospital medical assistance and resources to cardiac arrest patients. (December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hardeland, Camilla; Sunde, Kjetil; Ramsdal, Helge; Hebbert, Susan R.; Soilammi, Linda; Westmark, Fredrik; Nordum, Fredrik; Hansen, Andreas E.; Steen-Hansen, Jon E.; Olasveengen, Theresa M.
• Is Part Of: Resuscitation. Volume 109(2016)
• Page Start: 56
• Page End: 63
• Publication Date: 2016-12
• Subjects: Emergency medical dispatch -- cardiac arrest -- cardiopulmonary resuscitation -- cpr -- emergency medical communication centre -- dispatcher -- dispatchers -- mixed-methods; Resuscitation -- Periodicals; Resuscitation -- Periodicals; Réanimation -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 616.025
• DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.09.027
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0300-9572

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: Explore, understand and address issues that impact upon timely and adequate allocation of prehospital medical assistance and resources to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. Methods: Mixed-methods design obtaining data for one year in three emergency medical communication centres (EMCC); Oslo-Akershus (OA), Vestfold-Telemark (VT) and Østfold (Ø). Data collection included quantitative data from analysis of dispatch logs, ambulance records and audio files. Qualitative data were collected through in-depth interviews and non-participant observations. Results: OA-, VT- and Ø-EMCC responded to 1095 OHCAs and 579 of these calls were included for further analysis (333, 143 and 103, respectively). There were significant site differences in their recognition of OHCA (89, 94 and 78%, respectively, p < 0.001), provision of CPR instructions (83, 83 and 61%, respectively, p < 0.001), time from call answered to initial CPR instructions (1.4 min (1.2, 1.6), 1.1 min (0, 9, 1.2) and 1.3 (1.2, 1.7) respectively, p = 0.002). The most frequent reason for delayed or failed recognition of OHCA was misinterpretation of agonal breathing. Interviews and observations revealed individual differences in protocol use, interrogation strategy and assessment of breathing. Use of protocol was only part of decision making, dispatchers trusted their own clinical experience and intuition, and used assumptions about the patient and the situation as part of decision making. Conclusion: Agonal breathing continues to be the main barrier to recognition of cardiac arrest. Individual differences among dispatchers' strategies can directly impact on performance, mainly due to the wide definition of cardiac arrest and lack of uniform tools for assessment of breathing.