Choosing PLS path modeling as analytical method in European management research: A realist perspective. Issue 6 (December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rigdon, Edward E.
• Is Part Of: European management journal. Volume 34:Issue 6(2016:Dec.)
• Page Start: 598
• Page End: 605
• Publication Date: 2016-12
• Subjects: Structural equation modeling -- Partial least squares path modeling -- Scientific realism -- Conceptual variable -- Proxy variable -- Measurement error; Management -- Periodicals; Management -- Europe -- Periodicals; Gestion -- Périodiques; Gestion -- Europe -- Périodiques; Management; Europe; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 658.0094
• DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2016.05.006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0263-2373

Abstract

Abstract: Today, there is heightened controversy about the value of partial least squares (PLS) path modeling as a quantitative research method, including within the domain of European management research. Critical lines of argument within the management and psychology literature assert that there is no reason to use PLS path modeling at all. At the same time, authors using PLS path modeling continue to advance fallacious arguments to justify their choice of method. This paper identifies flaws on both sides—invalid arguments in favor of using PLS path modeling and invalid arguments opposing its use—within the context of a unifying framework and a realist philosophy of science.