The ethnographic turn – and after: a critical approach towards the realignment of art and anthropology. (November 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Grimshaw, Anna; Ravetz, Amanda
• Is Part Of: Social anthropology. Volume 23:Number 4(2015:Nov.)
• Page Start: 418
• Page End: 434
• Publication Date: 2015-11
• Subjects: ethnography -- art -- anthropology -- ethics -- aesthetics; ethnographie -- l'anthropologie -- l'art -- l'éthique -- l'esthétique; Ethnology -- Europe -- Periodicals; Europe -- Social life and customs -- Periodicals; 306
• DOI: 10.1111/1469-8676.12218
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0964-0282

Abstract

Abstract: The ethnographic turn has been the focus of recent debate between artists and anthropologists. Crucial to it has been an expansive notion of the ethnographic. No longer considered a specialised technique, the essays of Clifford and others have proposed a broader and more eclectic interpretation of ethnography – an approach long considered to be the exclusive preserve of academic anthropology. In this essay, we look more critically at what the ethnographic turn has meant for artists and anthropologists. To what extent does it describe a convergence of perspectives? Or does it elide significant differences in practice?