An Administrators' Association Partnership Translates to Gifted Education Advocacy. Issue 1 (January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Robinson, Ann
• Is Part Of: Gifted child today. Volume 44:Issue 1(2021)
• Page Start: 13
• Page End: 19
• Publication Date: 2021-01
• Subjects: advocacy -- gifted education -- history of gifted -- partnerships -- legislative -- policy development; Gifted children -- Education -- Periodicals; Gifted children -- Periodicals; 371.95
• DOI: 10.1177/1076217520963632
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1076-2175

Abstract

A formal partnership between a state-level umbrella association of educational administrators and one of its constituent associations, the association of gifted education administrators, has resulted in successful legislative and policy advocacy for gifted education. The formal partnership encouraged leaders of the gifted education professional community to identify as administrators and to collaborate with superintendents, principals, and other central office administrators. For the past three decades, this unique partnership has flourished and provides a model that other states can adapt to their context. In addition to the formal administrative association partnership, an informal partnership operates between two state gifted education associations (one focused on gifted education coordinators and administrators; the other focused on teachers and parents) and the umbrella organization of central office and building level educational administrators in the state. A key feature of the formal partnership is shared governance between the umbrella association and its 12 member associations, one of which comprises gifted education administrators. The informal partnership is linked by advocacy and policy development initiated by the salaried Legislative Advocate and a standing Legislative committee that includes the presidents of the state association for gifted education administrators and the president of the teacher and parent association. The benefits of the formal partnership and suggestions for initiating such a partnership in other states are discussed. The complexities of the informal partnership are explored.