Outpatient endometrial ablation: audit of outcomes and patient satisfaction. (16th November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ajmi, Ayesha; Das, Sangeeta
• Is Part Of: Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology. Volume 40:Number 8(2020)
• Page Start: 1145
• Page End: 1147
• Publication Date: 2020-11-16
• Subjects: Outpatient -- endometrial ablation -- pain score; Obstetrics -- Periodicals; Gynecology -- Periodicals; 618.05
• DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1700945
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0144-3615

Abstract

Abstract: Endometrial ablation in outpatient setting is associated with shorter hospital stay and quicker recovery. The primary outcome of this observational study was initiation and completion of procedure and secondary outcome measures were pain during the procedure and complications. The study was conducted in outpatient women's health clinic of Bolton Foundation NHS Trust UK, between March 2015 and July 2017. Out of 151 patients, all had oral analgesia at home. The procedure was initiated and completed in 83% cases. The median time for procedure was 78.5 s with range (34–120 s). The median intraoperative and immediate post-op pain score was 8 and 2, respectively. Post-procedure hysteroscopy confirmed intact cavity in all. Post-op analgesia was required in 2% cases. Eight-nine percent were discharged immediately, 10% had to be rested and observed for 30–60 min. None had serious complications. Ninety percent were satisfied with outpatient service and would recommend to friends and family. Impact Statement: What is already known on this subject? Second-generation endometrial ablation is an effective first-line management option for heavy menstrual bleeding. Outpatient procedure is associated with shorter hospital stay, quicker recovery and avoids general anaesthesia and its complications. What do the results of this study add? This observational study confirmed that it was suitable to start the procedure in 83% cases. Once started, it was possible to complete in 100%. The most common cause for not being able to start the procedure was intolerability to the patients. The median immediate post-procedure pain score was 2 which was highly acceptable to patients. 90% of patients who underwent the outpatient endometrial ablation would choose to have further hysteroscopic procedures as outpatient. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Patients should be given choice for endometrial ablation either with or without general anaesthesia. Patients should be carefully selected for outpatient procedure taking into account informed consent, tolerability of speculum examination and endometrial pipelle biopsy as well as understanding anticipation of some discomfort. Further randomised controlled trials should be carried out to determine patient satisfaction with endometrial ablation with or without general anaesthesia.