Optimizing psychosocial support in prostate cancer patients during active surveillance. Issue 3 (3rd July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Donachie, Kim; Cornel, Erik; Adriaansen, Marian; Mennes, Rosa; van Oort, Inge; Bakker, Esther; Lechner, Lilian
• Is Part Of: International journal of urological nursing. Volume 14:Issue 3(2020)
• Page Start: 115
• Page End: 123
• Publication Date: 2020-07-03
• Subjects: active surveillance -- prostate cancer -- prostatic neoplasms -- psychosocial support -- psychosocial support systems -- watchful waiting; Urological nursing -- Periodicals; 616.60231
• DOI: 10.1111/ijun.12242
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1749-7701

Abstract

Abstract: What are the psychosocial support needs of prostate cancer (PCa) patients undergoing active surveillance (AS)? The preferred management strategy for low‐risk PCa (LR‐PCa) is AS. Patients remain under close surveillance to monitor disease progression. However, living with untreated disease has psychosocial implications. The objective of this study was to investigate the psychosocial support needs in PCa patients undergoing AS. According to Marzouk (2018) 30% of patients risk developing anxiety during the first year of AS. Parker (2015) and Tan (2016) suggest approximately 10% of AS‐patients request a change to active treatment, often based on anxiety. Pickles (2007) states that psychosocial support can effectively reduce anxiety and uncertainty. A literature based interview guide was used to conduct 17 semi‐structured interviews following an explorative qualitative approach. LR‐PCa patients, eligible for AS, were enrolled from two participating Dutch urology clinics experienced with AS. Written informed consent was obtained. Inclusion ended after attaining data saturation. The interviews were transcribed verbatim. NVIVO 10 was used for open coding. Participants expressed recurring uncertainty and anxiety caused by medical examinations, lower urinary tract symptoms and erectile dysfunction. Various effective and ineffective coping strategies were adopted by participants. The use of specific strategies was associated with patient‐physician relationship, locus‐of‐control and disease‐acceptation. Ineffective coping strategies seemed to impede resilience during stressful situations. Satisfactory decision‐making and disease‐acceptation were promoted by immediate availability of relevant, reliable information regarding disease characteristics and treatment options. Early‐stage reliable and relevant information, assessment and encouragement of effective coping strategies appear to be important psychosocial support needs during AS. Most participants in this study had spousal support and completed higher education. Future research should determine the generalizability of these findings in a more heterogeneous population.