Losing the thread: a response to Robert Allen. (23rd July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Humphries, Jane; Schneider, Benjamin
• Is Part Of: Economic history review. Volume 73:Number 4(2020)
• Page Start: 1137
• Page End: 1152
• Publication Date: 2020-07-23
• Subjects: Economic history -- Periodicals; Great Britain -- Economic conditions -- Periodicals; 330.9
• DOI: 10.1111/ehr.12963
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0013-0117

Abstract

Abstract: In an earlier article we used archival and printed primary sources to construct the first long‐run wage series for hand spinning in early modern Britain. This evidence challenged Robert Allen's claim that spinners were part of the 'high wage economy', which he sees as motivating invention, innovation, and mechanization in the spinning section of the textile industry. We respond to Allen's subsequent criticism of our argument, sources, and methods, and his presentation of alternative evidence. Allen contends that we have understated both the earnings and associated productivity of hand spinners by focusing on part‐time and low‐quality workers. His rejoinder rests on an ahistorical account of spinners' work and similarly weak evidence on wages as did his initial claims. Our augmented version of the spinners' wages dataset confirms our original findings. Spinners' wages were low even compared with other women workers, and neither wages nor the piece rates that determined unit labour costs followed a trajectory that could explain the invention and spread of the spinning jenny.