Achieving an optimal shock-wave mitigation inside open channels with cavities for weak shock waves: A computational study. Issue 5 (July 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Brahmi, N.; Hadjadj, A.
• Is Part Of: Theoretical & applied mechanics letters. Volume 10:Issue 5(2020)
• Page Start: 354
• Page End: 365
• Publication Date: 2020-07
• Subjects: Shock diffraction -- Shock reflection -- Shock attenuation -- Vortex generation; Mechanics, Applied -- Periodicals; Mechanics, Analytic -- Periodicals; Mechanics, Analytic; Mechanics, Applied; Periodicals; 620.1
• DOI: 10.1016/j.taml.2020.01.046
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2095-0349

Abstract

HIGHLIGHTS: A shock-wave propagation and its attenuation in channel flows is studied. A best cavity depth and diffraction angle is found. An optimal arrangement of channel position/height and a cavity depth is found. A pressure attenuation by a factor of 57% is achieved. Abstract: This paper deals with a numerical study of weak shock-waves propagation and their attenuation in channel flow having different heights and exhibiting a hollow circular cavities with different depths and diffraction angles inside. The effect of initial diffraction angle and cavity depth on the shock mitigation is investigated. A better shock attenuation is achieved with diffraction angle θw = 90° by a factor of approximately 17% in terms of shock-Mach number and 38% in terms of total energy. The obtained results show also, in addition to the initial diffraction angle and cavity depth, the importance of reducing the channel heights as well as the position of the reduced section in achieving an optimal shock-wave attenuation. The presence of a cavity inside the channel helps to attenuate faster the shock wave. The underlying physics relies on the shock diffraction phenomenon that generates large amount of vortical structures capable of dissipating part of the shock energy by inducing a pressure loss behind it. A subtle arrangement of channel position/height and a cavity location leads to an efficient pressure attenuation by approximately a factor of 57% for M s = 1.6 and 16% for M s = 1.1.