Apparent differences between single layer molybdenum disulphide fabricated via chemical vapour deposition and exfoliation. (5th October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pollmann, Erik; Madauß, Lukas; Schumacher, Simon; Kumar, Uttam; Heuvel, Flemming; vom Ende, Christina; Yilmaz, Sümeyra; Güngörmüs, Sümeyra; Schleberger, Marika
• Is Part Of: Nanotechnology. Volume 31:Number 50(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-10-05
• Subjects: chemical vapour deposition -- 2D materials -- van der Waals heterostructures -- Raman spectroscopy -- MoS2 -- graphene; Nanotechnology -- Periodicals; Nanotechnology -- Periodicals; Nanotechnology; Publications périodiques; Nanotechnologies; Periodicals; 620.5
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/abb5d2
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0957-4484

Abstract

Abstract: Innovative applications based on two-dimensional solids require cost-effective fabrication processes resulting in large areas of high quality materials. Chemical vapour deposition is among the most promising methods to fulfill these requirements. However, for 2D materials prepared in this way it is generally assumed that they are of inferior quality in comparison to the exfoliated 2D materials commonly used in basic research. In this work we challenge this assumption and aim to quantify the differences in quality for the prototypical transition metal dichalcogenide MoS2 . To this end single layers of MoS2 prepared by different techniques (exfoliation, grown by different chemical vapour deposition methods, transfer techniques and as vertical heterostructure with graphene) are studied by Raman and photoluminescence spectroscopy, complemented by atomic force microscopy. We demonstrate that as-prepared MoS2, directly grown on SiO2, differs from exfoliated MoS2 in terms of higher photoluminescence, lower electron concentration and increased strain. As soon as a water film is intercalated (e.g. by transfer) underneath the grown MoS2, in particular the (opto)electronic properties become practically identical to those of exfoliated MoS2 . A comparison of the two most common precursors shows that the growth with MoO3 causes greater strain and/or defect density deviations than growth with ammonium heptamolybdate. As part of a heterostructure directly grown MoS2 interacts much stronger with the substrate and in this case an intercalated water film does not lead to the complete decoupling, which is typical for exfoliation or transfer. Our work shows that the supposedly poorer quality of grown 2D transition metal dichalcogenides is indeed a misconception.