Evaluation of laser diffraction-based particle size measurements using digital inline holography. (7th October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kumar, S Santosh; He, Zilong; Hogan, Christopher J; Fredericks, Steven A; Hong, Jiarong
• Is Part Of: Measurement science & technology. Volume 31:Number 12(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-10-07
• Subjects: digital inline holography -- laser diffraction -- particle sizing; Physical measurements -- Periodicals; Scientific apparatus and instruments -- Periodicals; Equipment and Supplies -- Periodicals; Science -- instrumentation -- Periodicals; Technology -- instrumentation -- Periodicals; Mesures physiques -- Périodiques; Physical measurements; Scientific apparatus and instruments; Periodicals; 502.87
• DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/aba78b
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0957-0233

Abstract

Abstract: The measurements of size distribution of small particles (e.g. dusts, droplets, bubbles, etc) are critical for a broad range of applications in environmental science, public health, industrial manufacturing, etc. Laser diffraction (LD), a widely used method for such applications, depends on model-based inversion with underlying assumptions on particle properties. Furthermore, the presence of sampling biases such as velocity differentials are often overlooked in simple ex-situ calibrations, which introduces as an additional source of error. In contrast, digital inline holography (DIH), a single camera coherent imaging technique, can both measure particle size distributions without the need for a model-based inversion and can directly provide information on the shape characteristics of the particles. In this study, we evaluate the performance of an LD system in characterizing polydisperse droplets produced in a flat fan spray using in-situ DIH based imaging as a reference. The systematic differences in the two techniques are examined. A droplet-trajectory-based correction for the LD-inferred size distributions is proposed to compensate for the observed differences. We validate the correction using NIST standard polydisperse particles undergoing differential settling, and then apply the correction to polydisperse spray droplet measurements. The correction improves agreement between LD and DIH size distributions for droplets over two orders of magnitude, but with LD still underestimating the fraction of droplets at sizes above ∼1 mm. This underestimation is possibly linked to the complex oscillatory and rotational motion of droplets which cannot be faithfully captured by measurement or modelled by the correction algorithm without additional information.