On characterizing root function in perennial horticultural crops. Issue 9 (9th September 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lavely, Emily K.; Chen, Weile; Peterson, K. Aysha; Klodd, Annie E.; Volder, Astrid; Marini, Richard P.; Eissenstat, David M.
• Is Part Of: American journal of botany. Volume 107:Issue 9(2020)
• Page Start: 1214
• Page End: 1224
• Publication Date: 2020-09-09
• Subjects: absorptive roots -- branch order -- fine roots -- mycorrhizal fungi -- phylogeny -- plant functional traits -- root diameter; Botany -- Periodicals; Botany; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 580
• DOI: 10.1002/ajb2.1530
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0002-9122

Abstract

Abstract : Premise: While root‐order approaches to fine‐root classification have shown wide utility among wild plants, they have seen limited use for perennial crop plants. Moreover, inadequate characterization of fine roots across species of domesticated perennial crops has led to a knowledge gap in the understanding of evolutionary and functional patterns associated with different fine‐root orders. Methods: We examined fine‐root traits of common horticultural fruit and nut crops: Malus × domestica, Prunus persica, Vitus vinifera, Prunus dulcis, and Citrus × clementina . Additional roots were sampled from 33 common perennial horticultural crops, native to tropical, subtropical, and temperate regions, to examine variation in 1st‐ and 2nd‐order absorptive roots. Results: First‐order roots of grape and 1st‐ and 2nd‐order roots of apple and peach were consistently thin, nonwoody, mycorrhizal, and had high N:C ratios. In contrast, 4th‐ and 5th‐order roots of grape and 5th‐order roots of apple and peach were woody, nonmycorrhizal, had low N:C ratios, and were thicker than lower‐order roots. Among the 33 horticultural species, diameter of 1st‐ and 2nd‐order roots varied about 15‐fold, ranging from 0.04 to 0.60 mm and 0.05 to 0.89 mm respectively. This variation generally was phylogenetically conserved across plant lineages. Conclusions: Collectively, our research shows that root‐order characterization has considerably more utility than an arbitrary diameter cutoff for identifying roots of different functions in perennial horticultural crops. In addition, much of the variation in root diameter among species can be predicted by evolutionary relationships.