Safety and Efficacy of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol After Hepatic Resection. Issue 10 (30th October 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Safety and Efficacy of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol After Hepatic Resection. Issue 10 (30th October 2020)
- Main Title:
- Safety and Efficacy of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol After Hepatic Resection
- Authors:
- Lee, Jennifer A.
Young, Stephanie
O'Connor, Victoria
DiFronzo, Louis Andrew - Abstract:
- Enhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) have shown to improve outcomes in multiple specialties and were recently applied to hepatic resections. The objective of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of ERP in hepatic resection. Between 2013-2017, 208 patients underwent hepatectomy. The ERP included early ambulation, early oral intake, and multimodal analgesia. Primary study end points were hospital length of stay (LOS) and overall morbidity; secondary end points were return of bowel function (ROBF), 30-day readmission, and 90-day mortality. Major hepatectomies were selected for separate analysis. Overall, pre-ERP (N = 99) and ERP (N = 109) were similar in demographics. ERP patients had earlier oral intake and ROBF with similar overall morbidity. Although median LOS was 5 days, 43% of ERP patients had LOS ≤4 days vs. 27% in the pre-ERP cohort ( P = .02). 30-day readmission was similar (12%), and 90-day mortality was 2.8% vs. 3.0% (pre-ERP vs. ERP, P = .90). In major hepatectomies, pre-ERP (N = 41) and ERP (N = 33) demographics and operative characteristics were similar. ERP patients had earlier oral intake and ROBF with similar morbidity and mortality. There was no significant difference in median LOS; however, 36% of the major hepatectomy ERP patients had LOS ≤4 days vs. 17% of pre-ERP patients, P = .06. In conclusion, ERP can be safely implemented in hepatectomy, with earlier oral intake and ROBF, shorter LOS in some patients, and no increase in morbidity orEnhanced recovery protocols (ERPs) have shown to improve outcomes in multiple specialties and were recently applied to hepatic resections. The objective of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of ERP in hepatic resection. Between 2013-2017, 208 patients underwent hepatectomy. The ERP included early ambulation, early oral intake, and multimodal analgesia. Primary study end points were hospital length of stay (LOS) and overall morbidity; secondary end points were return of bowel function (ROBF), 30-day readmission, and 90-day mortality. Major hepatectomies were selected for separate analysis. Overall, pre-ERP (N = 99) and ERP (N = 109) were similar in demographics. ERP patients had earlier oral intake and ROBF with similar overall morbidity. Although median LOS was 5 days, 43% of ERP patients had LOS ≤4 days vs. 27% in the pre-ERP cohort ( P = .02). 30-day readmission was similar (12%), and 90-day mortality was 2.8% vs. 3.0% (pre-ERP vs. ERP, P = .90). In major hepatectomies, pre-ERP (N = 41) and ERP (N = 33) demographics and operative characteristics were similar. ERP patients had earlier oral intake and ROBF with similar morbidity and mortality. There was no significant difference in median LOS; however, 36% of the major hepatectomy ERP patients had LOS ≤4 days vs. 17% of pre-ERP patients, P = .06. In conclusion, ERP can be safely implemented in hepatectomy, with earlier oral intake and ROBF, shorter LOS in some patients, and no increase in morbidity or mortality. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- American surgeon. Volume 86:Issue 10(2020)
- Journal:
- American surgeon
- Issue:
- Volume 86:Issue 10(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 86, Issue 10 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 86
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0086-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- 1396
- Page End:
- 1400
- Publication Date:
- 2020-10-30
- Subjects:
- enhanced recovery protocols -- hepatectomy -- liver -- length of stay
Surgery -- Periodicals
Surgery -- United States -- Periodicals
617.0973 - Journal URLs:
- https://journals.sagepub.com/home/asua ↗
http://www.sagepublications.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/0003134820964492 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0003-1348
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14385.xml