How functional network connectivity changes as a result of lesion and recovery: An investigation of the network phenotype of stroke. (October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tao, Yuan; Rapp, Brenda
• Is Part Of: Cortex. Volume 131(2020)
• Page Start: 17
• Page End: 41
• Publication Date: 2020-10
• Subjects: Stroke recovery -- Neuroplasticity -- Language deficit -- Functional connectivity -- Functional network; Neuropsychology -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Psychophysiology -- Periodicals; Behavior -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; 612.825
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2020.06.011
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0010-9452

Abstract

Abstract: This study, through a series of univariate and multivariate (classification) analyses, investigated fMRI task-based functional connectivity (FC) at pre- and post-treatment time-points in 18 individuals with chronic post-stroke dysgraphia. The investigation examined the effects of lesion and treatment-based recovery on functional organization, focusing on both inter-hemispheric (homotopic) and intra-hemispheric connectivity. The work confirmed, in the chronic stage, the "network phenotype of stroke injury" proposed by Siegel et al. (2016) consisting of abnormally low inter-hemispheric connectivity as well as abnormally high intra-hemispheric (ipsilesional) connectivity. In terms of recovery-based changes in FC, this study found overall hyper-normalization of these abnormal inter and intra-hemispheric connectivity patterns, suggestive of over-correction. Specifically, treatment-related homotopic FC increases were observed between left and right dorsal frontal-parietal regions. With regard to intra-hemispheric connections, recovery was dominated by increased ipsilateral connectivity between frontal and parietal regions along with decreased connectivity between the frontal regions and posterior parietal-occipital-temporal areas. Both inter and intra-hemispheric changes were associated with treatment-driven improvements in spelling performance. We suggest an interpretation according to which, with treatment, as posterior orthographic processing areas become more effective, executive control from frontal-parietal networks becomes less necessary.