Twelve out of 117 recovered COVID-19 patients retest positive in a single-center study of China. (September 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Twelve out of 117 recovered COVID-19 patients retest positive in a single-center study of China. (September 2020)
- Main Title:
- Twelve out of 117 recovered COVID-19 patients retest positive in a single-center study of China
- Authors:
- Ye, Hua
Zhao, Chengguang
Yang, Lehe
Yu, Wenwen
Leng, Zhefeng
Sun, Yangjie
Xiao, Zhongxiang
Zhang, Xie
Zheng, Long
Ye, Xinxin
Zheng, Legui
Huang, Xiaoying
Dai, Yuanrong
Li, Jifa - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: It has been reported that a fraction of recovered coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) patients have retested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for retesting positive have not been studied extensively. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, we included adult patients (≥ 18 years old) diagnosed as COVID-19 in Affiliated Yueqing Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China. All the patients were discharged before March 31, 2020, and were re-tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) after meeting the discharge criteria. We retrospectively analyzed this cohort of 117 discharged patients and analyzed the differences between retest positive and negative patients in terms of demographics, clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, chest computed tomography (CT) features and treatment procedures. Findings: Compared with the negative group, the positive group had a higher proportion of patients with comorbidities (Odds Ratio(OR) =2·12, 95% Confidence Interval(CI) 0·48–9·46; p = 0·029), longer hospital stay (OR=1·21, 95% CI 1·07–1·36; p = 0·008), a higher proportion of patients with lymphocytopenia ( p = 0·036), a higher proportion of antibiotics treatment ( p = 0·008) and glucocorticoids treatment ( p = 0·003). Multivariable regression showed increasing odds of positive SARS-CoV-2 retest after discharge associated with longer hospital stayAbstract: Background: It has been reported that a fraction of recovered coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) patients have retested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Clinical characteristics and risk factors for retesting positive have not been studied extensively. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center cohort study, we included adult patients (≥ 18 years old) diagnosed as COVID-19 in Affiliated Yueqing Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Zhejiang, China. All the patients were discharged before March 31, 2020, and were re-tested for SARS-CoV-2 RNA by real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) after meeting the discharge criteria. We retrospectively analyzed this cohort of 117 discharged patients and analyzed the differences between retest positive and negative patients in terms of demographics, clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, chest computed tomography (CT) features and treatment procedures. Findings: Compared with the negative group, the positive group had a higher proportion of patients with comorbidities (Odds Ratio(OR) =2·12, 95% Confidence Interval(CI) 0·48–9·46; p = 0·029), longer hospital stay (OR=1·21, 95% CI 1·07–1·36; p = 0·008), a higher proportion of patients with lymphocytopenia ( p = 0·036), a higher proportion of antibiotics treatment ( p = 0·008) and glucocorticoids treatment ( p = 0·003). Multivariable regression showed increasing odds of positive SARS-CoV-2 retest after discharge associated with longer hospital stay (OR=1·22, 95% CI 1·08–1·38; p = 0·001), and lymphocytopenia (OR=7·74, 95% CI 1·70–35·21; p = 0·008) on admission. Interpretation: Patients with COVID-19 who met discharge criteria could still test positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Longer hospital stay and lymphopenia could be potential risk factors for positive SARS-CoV-2 retest in COVID-19 patients after hospital discharge. Funding: Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, Medical Scientific Research Fund of Zhejiang Province, Wenzhou science and technology project … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- EClinicalMedicine. Volume 26(2020)
- Journal:
- EClinicalMedicine
- Issue:
- Volume 26(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 26, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 26
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0026-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2020-09
- Subjects:
- Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals
Medical policy -- Periodicals
Clinical Medicine
Health Policy
Public Health
Medical policy
Medicine -- Research
Periodical
Electronic journals
Periodicals
613 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/25895370 ↗
http://www.sciencedirect.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100492 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2589-5370
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14365.xml