The response‐time relationship and covariate effects of acupuncture for chronic pain: A systematic review and model‐based longitudinal meta‐analysis. (31st July 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The response‐time relationship and covariate effects of acupuncture for chronic pain: A systematic review and model‐based longitudinal meta‐analysis. (31st July 2020)
- Main Title:
- The response‐time relationship and covariate effects of acupuncture for chronic pain: A systematic review and model‐based longitudinal meta‐analysis
- Authors:
- Li, Caixia
Pei, Qi
Chen, Yaolong
Luo, Xufei
Yang, Nan
Li, Thomas T.
Ding, Junjie
Wang, Yingwei - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background and Objective: Critical clinical questions regarding how soon and how long the analgesic effect will be achieved by acupuncture, as well as who will be responsive to acupuncture, need further address. The aim of the study was to investigate the response‐time relationship and covariate effects of acupuncture. Databases and Data Treatment: PubMed and EMBASE were searched up to December 2018 for randomized controlled trials that involved sham acupuncture, true acupuncture and conventional therapy. We used a model‐based longitudinal meta‐analysis to characterize the response‐time profile of these treatments. Results: Seventy‐seven randomized clinical trials involved chronic shoulder, neck, knee and low back pain were included. The response‐time analysis suggested that the treatment duration of acupuncture will be 5 weeks or more to achieve 80% of maximum analgesic effect. Moreover a lower baseline pain intensity and the location of low back pain resulted in a lower pain relief of acupuncture intervention. The absolute maximum analgesic effects of sham acupuncture and conventional therapy were 22.6 and 15.8 points at a 0–100 NRS scale. The absolute effect of true acupuncture was 26.1 points for low back pain (relative effect of 3.5 and 9.4 points to sham and conventional therapy), 34.9 points for other pain body locations (relative effect of 12.3 and 19.1 points to sham and conventional therapy), in patients with a baseline pain intensity of 60 points.Abstract: Background and Objective: Critical clinical questions regarding how soon and how long the analgesic effect will be achieved by acupuncture, as well as who will be responsive to acupuncture, need further address. The aim of the study was to investigate the response‐time relationship and covariate effects of acupuncture. Databases and Data Treatment: PubMed and EMBASE were searched up to December 2018 for randomized controlled trials that involved sham acupuncture, true acupuncture and conventional therapy. We used a model‐based longitudinal meta‐analysis to characterize the response‐time profile of these treatments. Results: Seventy‐seven randomized clinical trials involved chronic shoulder, neck, knee and low back pain were included. The response‐time analysis suggested that the treatment duration of acupuncture will be 5 weeks or more to achieve 80% of maximum analgesic effect. Moreover a lower baseline pain intensity and the location of low back pain resulted in a lower pain relief of acupuncture intervention. The absolute maximum analgesic effects of sham acupuncture and conventional therapy were 22.6 and 15.8 points at a 0–100 NRS scale. The absolute effect of true acupuncture was 26.1 points for low back pain (relative effect of 3.5 and 9.4 points to sham and conventional therapy), 34.9 points for other pain body locations (relative effect of 12.3 and 19.1 points to sham and conventional therapy), in patients with a baseline pain intensity of 60 points. Conclusion: The treatment duration of acupuncture will not be less than 5 weeks to achieve 80% maximum analgesic effect. Higher analgesic effect was related to higher baseline pain intensity and pain location of neck, shoulder and knee. Significance: Our systematic review and meta‐analysis provides the clear evidence for the treatment duration and significant related covariates of acupuncture intervention for chronic pain. These results provide useful suggestion for acupuncture intervention in clinical pain management. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of pain. Volume 24:Number 9(2020)
- Journal:
- European journal of pain
- Issue:
- Volume 24:Number 9(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 24, Issue 9 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 24
- Issue:
- 9
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0024-0009-0000
- Page Start:
- 1653
- Page End:
- 1665
- Publication Date:
- 2020-07-31
- Subjects:
- Pain -- Periodicals
Pain -- Treatment -- Periodicals
Pain -- Physiological aspects -- Periodicals
616.0472 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1532-2149 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/ejp.1617 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1090-3801
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.733382
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14355.xml