Stroke Treatment Delay Limits Outcome After Mechanical Thrombectomy: Stratification by Arrival Time and ASPECTS. Issue 5 (27th June 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Snyder, Thomas; Agarwal, Shashank; Huang, Jeffrey; Ishida, Koto; Flusty, Brent; Frontera, Jennifer; Lord, Aaron; Torres, Jose; Zhang, Cen; Rostanski, Sara; Favate, Albert; Lillemoe, Kaitlyn; Sanger, Matthew; Kim, Sun; Humbert, Kelley; Scher, Erica; Dehkharghani, Seena; Raz, Eytan; Shapiro, Maksim; K Nelson, Peter; Gordon, David; Tanweer, Omar; Nossek, Erez; Farkas, Jeffrey; Liff, Jeremy; Turkel‐Parrella, David; Tiwari, Ambooj; Riina, Howard; Yaghi, Shadi
• Is Part Of: Journal of neuroimaging. Volume 30:Issue 5(2020)
• Page Start: 625
• Page End: 630
• Publication Date: 2020-06-27
• Subjects: Ischemic stroke -- mechanical thrombectomy -- outcome -- time to treatment; Diagnostic imaging -- Periodicals; Nervous system -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals; Imagerie pour le diagnostic -- Périodiques; Système nerveux -- Maladies -- Diagnostic -- Périodiques; Imagerie médicale; Neuroimagerie; Neurologie; Système nerveux; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); 616.804754
• DOI: 10.1111/jon.12729
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1051-2284

Abstract

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has helped many patients achieve functional independence. The effect of time‐to‐treatment based in specific epochs and as related to Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) has not been established. The goal of the study was to evaluate the association between last known normal (LKN)‐to‐puncture time and good functional outcome. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing MT for large vessel occlusion. We used binary logistic regression models adjusted for age, Modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia score, initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, and noncontrast CT ASPECTS to assess the association between LKN‐to‐puncture time and favorable outcome defined as Modified Rankin Score 0‐2 on discharge. RESULTS: Among 421 patients, 328 were included in analysis. Increased LKN‐to‐puncture time was associated with decreased probability of good functional outcome (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] ratio per 15‐minute delay = .98; 95% confidence interval [CI], .97‐.99; P = .001). This was especially true when LKN‐puncture time was 0‐6 hours (aOR per 15‐minute delay = .94; 95% CI, .89‐.99; P = .05) or ASPECTS 8‐10 (aOR = .98; 95% CI, .97‐.99; P = .002) as opposed to when LKN‐puncture time was 6‐24 hours (aOR per 15‐minute delay = .99; 95% CI, .97‐1.00; P = .16) and ASPECTS <8 (aOR = .98; 95% CI, .93‐1.03; P = .37). CONCLUSION: Decreased LKN‐groin puncture time improves outcome particularly in those with good ASPECTS presenting within 6 hours. Strategies to decrease reperfusion times should be investigated, particularly in those in the early time window and with good ASPECTS.