Assessment of the clinical utility of pharmacogenetic guidance in a comprehensive medication management service. Issue 6 (26th May 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rodríguez‐Escudero, Idaliz; Cedeño, Julio A.; Rodríguez‐Nazario, Ileana; Reynaldo‐Fernández, Gledys; Rodríguez‐Vera, Leyanis; Morales, Niretzy; Jiménez‐Vélez, Braulio; Ruaño, Gualberto; Duconge, Jorge
• Is Part Of: Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy. Volume 3:Issue 6(2020)
• Page Start: 1028
• Page End: 1037
• Publication Date: 2020-05-26
• Subjects: pharmacogenetics -- cytochrome P450 -- clinical decision support; Pharmacy -- Periodicals; Pharmacy Service, Hospital; Periodicals; Electronic journals; Periodical; 615.105
• DOI: 10.1002/jac5.1250
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2574-9870

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Pharmacists are poised to be the health care professionals best suited to provide medication‐related consults and services based on a patient's genetics. Despite its potential benefits, the implementation of pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing into primary clinical settings has been slow among medically underserved populations. To our knowledge, this is the first time that PGx‐driven recommendations have been incorporated into a Comprehensive Medication Management (CMM) service in a Hispanic population. Objectives: The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical utility of adding PGx guidance into pharmacist‐driven CMM. Methods: This is a pre‐ and post‐interventional design study. Patients were recruited from a psychologist's clinic. A total of 24 patients had a face‐to‐face interview with a pharmacist to complete a CMM, Personal Medication Record, and Medication‐Related Action Plan (MAP) blind to PGx findings. Collected buccal DNA samples were genotyped using drug‐metabolizing enzymes and transporters (DMET) Plus Array. Results: The pharmacist generated new MAPs for each patient based on PGx results. Genetic variants that could potentially affect the safety and effectiveness of at least one drug in the pharmacotherapy were identified in 96% of patients, for whom the pharmacist changed the initial recommendations. Polymorphisms in genes encoding for isoenzymes CYP2D6, CYP2C19, and CYP2C9 were identified in 83%, 52%, and 41% of patients, respectively. Pharmacists performing CMM identified 22 additional medication problems after PGx determinations. Moreover, they agreed with the clinical utility of PGx in the studied sample based on perceived value of adding PGx to traditional CMM and its utility in the decision‐making process of pharmacists. Conclusions: The study confirmed the critical role to be played by pharmacists in facilitating the clinical usage of relevant genetic information to optimize drug therapy decisions as well as their involvement on many levels of these multidisciplinary implementation efforts, including championing and leading PGx‐guided CMM services.