The search for sexually antagonistic genes: Practical insights from studies of local adaptation and statistical genomics. Issue 5 (31st August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ruzicka, Filip; Dutoit, Ludovic; Czuppon, Peter; Jordan, Crispin Y.; Li, Xiang‐Yi; Olito, Colin; Runemark, Anna; Svensson, Erik I.; Yazdi, Homa Papoli; Connallon, Tim
• Is Part Of: Evolution letters. Volume 4:Issue 5(2020)
• Page Start: 398
• Page End: 415
• Publication Date: 2020-08-31
• Subjects: Evolutionary genomics -- fitness variation -- FST -- FIS -- genomic inference of natural selection -- intralocus sexual conflict -- local adaptation; Evolution (Biology) -- Periodicals; Evolution (Biology); Biological Evolution; Electronic journals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; Periodicals; Periodicals; Periodical; 576.8
• DOI: 10.1002/evl3.192
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2056-3744

Abstract

Abstract: Sexually antagonistic (SA) genetic variation—in which alleles favored in one sex are disfavored in the other—is predicted to be common and has been documented in several animal and plant populations, yet we currently know little about its pervasiveness among species or its population genetic basis. Recent applications of genomics in studies of SA genetic variation have highlighted considerable methodological challenges to the identification and characterization of SA genes, raising questions about the feasibility of genomic approaches for inferring SA selection. The related fields of local adaptation and statistical genomics have previously dealt with similar challenges, and lessons from these disciplines can therefore help overcome current difficulties in applying genomics to study SA genetic variation. Here, we integrate theoretical and analytical concepts from local adaptation and statistical genomics research—including F ST and F IS statistics, genome‐wide association studies, pedigree analyses, reciprocal transplant studies, and evolve‐and‐resequence experiments—to evaluate methods for identifying SA genes and genome‐wide signals of SA genetic variation. We begin by developing theoretical models for between‐sex F ST and F IS, including explicit null distributions for each statistic, and using them to critically evaluate putative multilocus signals of sex‐specific selection in previously published datasets. We then highlight new statistics that address some of the limitations of F ST and F IS, along with applications of more direct approaches for characterizing SA genetic variation, which incorporate explicit fitness measurements. We finish by presenting practical guidelines for the validation and evolutionary analysis of candidate SA genes and discussing promising empirical systems for future work.