Quantitative assessment of pelvic floor muscle extensibility in pregnant women with a perineal elasticity meter. (1st November 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Paschoal, Aline; Zanetti, Miriam Raquel Diniz; Petricelli, Carla Dellabarba; Alexandre, Sandra Maria; Araujo Júnior, Edward; Nakamura, Mary Uchiyama
• Is Part Of: Journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine. Volume 33:Number 21(2020)
• Page Start: 3591
• Page End: 3595
• Publication Date: 2020-11-01
• Subjects: Pelvic floor -- perineum -- physiotherapy modalities -- pregnancy; Obstetrics -- Periodicals; Perinatology -- Periodicals; Infants (Newborn) -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Neonatology -- Periodicals; 618.2
• DOI: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1579792
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1476-7058

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: The objective of this study was to compare measurements of pelvic floor muscle extensibility in pregnant women obtained through the Epi-no ® and perineal elasticity meter (PEM) devices. Methods: This was an observational, cross-sectional study with a consecutive sample, conducted in a prenatal care outpatient clinic. The pelvic floors of 62 healthy pregnant women with gestational ages between 35 and 40 weeks were assessed. Perineal extensibility was measured using the Epi-no ® and PEM devices. Through the linear regression method, a formula was created to calculate the Epi-no ® values from the PEM values. To determine the degree of relationship between both variables, Pearson's correlation coefficient was used. Results: In the comparison of the results for 62 pregnant women using the two perineal extensibility assessment methods, the value obtained in the Pearson correlation coefficient analysis (0.621) indicated a moderate relationship between the variables. This finding was not confirmed by the Kappa correlation test. When the measurements were classified into three groups, a slight correlation was identified (perineum with restrictions, moderate extensibility, and good extensibility). Conclusion: There was a relationship between Epi-no ® and PEM from slight to moderate agreement.