A Review of In Silico Tools as Alternatives to Animal Testing: Principles, Resources and Applications. Issue 4 (July 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A Review of In Silico Tools as Alternatives to Animal Testing: Principles, Resources and Applications. Issue 4 (July 2020)
- Main Title:
- A Review of In Silico Tools as Alternatives to Animal Testing: Principles, Resources and Applications
- Authors:
- Madden, Judith C.
Enoch, Steven J.
Paini, Alicia
Cronin, Mark T.D. - Abstract:
- Across the spectrum of industrial sectors, including pharmaceuticals, chemicals, personal care products, food additives and their associated regulatory agencies, there is a need to develop robust and reliable methods to reduce or replace animal testing. It is generally recognised that no single alternative method will be able to provide a one-to-one replacement for assays based on more complex toxicological endpoints. Hence, information from a combination of techniques is required. A greater understanding of the time and concentration-dependent mechanisms, underlying the interactions between chemicals and biological systems, and the sequence of events that can lead to apical effects, will help to move forward the science of reducing and replacing animal experiments. In silico modelling, in vitro assays, high-throughput screening, organ-on-a-chip technology, omics and mathematical biology, can provide complementary information to develop a complete picture of the potential response of an organism to a chemical stressor. Adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) and systems biology frameworks enable relevant information from diverse sources to be logically integrated. While individual researchers do not need to be experts across all disciplines, it is useful to have a fundamental understanding of what other areas of science have to offer, and how knowledge can be integrated with other disciplines. The purpose of this review is to provide those who are unfamiliar with predictive inAcross the spectrum of industrial sectors, including pharmaceuticals, chemicals, personal care products, food additives and their associated regulatory agencies, there is a need to develop robust and reliable methods to reduce or replace animal testing. It is generally recognised that no single alternative method will be able to provide a one-to-one replacement for assays based on more complex toxicological endpoints. Hence, information from a combination of techniques is required. A greater understanding of the time and concentration-dependent mechanisms, underlying the interactions between chemicals and biological systems, and the sequence of events that can lead to apical effects, will help to move forward the science of reducing and replacing animal experiments. In silico modelling, in vitro assays, high-throughput screening, organ-on-a-chip technology, omics and mathematical biology, can provide complementary information to develop a complete picture of the potential response of an organism to a chemical stressor. Adverse outcome pathways (AOPs) and systems biology frameworks enable relevant information from diverse sources to be logically integrated. While individual researchers do not need to be experts across all disciplines, it is useful to have a fundamental understanding of what other areas of science have to offer, and how knowledge can be integrated with other disciplines. The purpose of this review is to provide those who are unfamiliar with predictive in silico tools, with a fundamental understanding of the underlying theory. Current applications, software, barriers to acceptance, new developments and the use of integrated approaches are all discussed, with additional resources being signposted for each of the topics. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- ATLA. Volume 48:Issue 4(2020)
- Journal:
- ATLA
- Issue:
- Volume 48:Issue 4(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 48, Issue 4 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 48
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0048-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- 146
- Page End:
- 172
- Publication Date:
- 2020-07
- Subjects:
- in silico -- model evaluation -- QSAR -- read-across -- review -- SAR -- similarity
Laboratory animals -- Periodicals
616.0273 - Journal URLs:
- https://journals.sagepub.com/home/atl ↗
http://www.uk.sagepub.com/home.nav ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/0261192920965977 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0261-1929
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14323.xml