Thermodynamic comparison of direct supercritical CO2 and indirect brine-ORC concepts for geothermal combined heat and power generation. (December 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Thermodynamic comparison of direct supercritical CO2 and indirect brine-ORC concepts for geothermal combined heat and power generation. (December 2020)
- Main Title:
- Thermodynamic comparison of direct supercritical CO2 and indirect brine-ORC concepts for geothermal combined heat and power generation
- Authors:
- Schifflechner, Christopher
Dawo, Fabian
Eyerer, Sebastian
Wieland, Christoph
Spliethoff, Hartmut - Abstract:
- Abstract: Petrothermal reservoirs contain a tremendous technical potential without major regional restrictions. The application of supercritical CO2 (sCO2 ) as a heat carrier might be a promising alternative to the commonly discussed usage of water. This study evaluates both heat carriers for a CHP application. A novel CHP plant layout for a thermosiphon with direct utilization of sCO2 for power generation and a pumped brine system with a parallel CHP plant and power generation by an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) are compared for a defined mass flow rate of 225 kg/s and reservoir conditions of 180 °C and 49 MPa. For the ORC with R245fa the annual amount of net electricity is 3% higher than for the ORC with R1233zd(E) and 8% higher than for the sCO2 case. The net power of the sCO2 plant displays a significantly higher sensitivity to changes of the heat demand compared to the brine-ORC system. While the average exergetic efficiency for the brine concept is 40.9% for R245fa and 40.0% for R1233zd(E), respectively, the sCO2 concept reaches an average efficiency of 72.6%. Finally, two different operation strategies for the sCO2 CHP plant are investigated against the background of potential turbine part-load models. Graphical abstract: Image 1 Highlights: Petrothermal resources have a tremendous potential for heat and power generation. Supercritical sCO2 and water are compared as potential heat carriers. sCO2 displays a higher sensitivity to varying heat demand. The selectedAbstract: Petrothermal reservoirs contain a tremendous technical potential without major regional restrictions. The application of supercritical CO2 (sCO2 ) as a heat carrier might be a promising alternative to the commonly discussed usage of water. This study evaluates both heat carriers for a CHP application. A novel CHP plant layout for a thermosiphon with direct utilization of sCO2 for power generation and a pumped brine system with a parallel CHP plant and power generation by an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) are compared for a defined mass flow rate of 225 kg/s and reservoir conditions of 180 °C and 49 MPa. For the ORC with R245fa the annual amount of net electricity is 3% higher than for the ORC with R1233zd(E) and 8% higher than for the sCO2 case. The net power of the sCO2 plant displays a significantly higher sensitivity to changes of the heat demand compared to the brine-ORC system. While the average exergetic efficiency for the brine concept is 40.9% for R245fa and 40.0% for R1233zd(E), respectively, the sCO2 concept reaches an average efficiency of 72.6%. Finally, two different operation strategies for the sCO2 CHP plant are investigated against the background of potential turbine part-load models. Graphical abstract: Image 1 Highlights: Petrothermal resources have a tremendous potential for heat and power generation. Supercritical sCO2 and water are compared as potential heat carriers. sCO2 displays a higher sensitivity to varying heat demand. The selected turbine-part load model has an significant impact. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Renewable energy. Volume 161(2020)
- Journal:
- Renewable energy
- Issue:
- Volume 161(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 161, Issue 2020 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 161
- Issue:
- 2020
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0161-2020-0000
- Page Start:
- 1292
- Page End:
- 1302
- Publication Date:
- 2020-12
- Subjects:
- Enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) -- Supercritical CO2 (sCO2) -- Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) -- Geothermal energy -- Combined heat and power (CHP) -- CO2 plume geothermal (CPG) systems
Renewable energy sources -- Periodicals
Power resources -- Periodicals
Énergies renouvelables -- Périodiques
Ressources énergétiques -- Périodiques
333.794 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/09601481 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.renene.2020.07.044 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0960-1481
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 7364.187000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14314.xml