Adaptive radiotherapy based on statistical process control for oropharyngeal cancer. Issue 9 (8th August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Wang, Hesheng; Xue, Jinyu; Chen, Ting; Qu, Tanxia; Barbee, David; Tam, Moses; Hu, Kenneth
• Is Part Of: Journal of applied clinical medical physics. Volume 21:Issue 9(2020)
• Page Start: 171
• Page End: 177
• Publication Date: 2020-08-08
• Subjects: adaptive radiotherapy -- head and neck cancer -- oropharyngeal cancer -- statistical process control; Medical physics -- Periodicals; Clinical medicine -- Periodicals; Health Physics; Clinical Medicine; Electronic journals; Periodicals; Periodicals; Fulltext; Internet Resources; 610.153
• DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12993
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1526-9914

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: The purpose of this study is to quantify dosimetric changes throughout the delivery of oropharyngeal cancer treatment and to investigate the application of statistical process control (SPC) for the management of significant deviations during the course of radiotherapy. Methods: Thirteen oropharyngeal cancer patients with daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) were retrospectively reviewed. Cone beam computed tomography images of every other fraction were imported to the Velocity software and registered to planning CT using the 6 DOF (degrees of freedom) couch shifts generated during patient setup. Using Velocity "Adaptive Monitoring" module, the setup‐corrected CBCT was matched to planning CT using a deformable registration. Volumes and dose metrics at each fraction were calculated and rated with plan values to evaluate interfractional dosimetric variations using a SPC framework. T ‐tests between plan and fraction volumes were performed to find statistically insignificant fractions. Average upper and lower process capacity limits (UCL, LCL) of each dose metric were derived from these fractions using conventional SPC guidelines. Results: Gross tumor volume (GTV) and organ at risk (OAR) volumes in the first 13 fractions had no significant changes from the pretreatment planning CT. The GTV and the parotid glands subsequently decreased by 10% at the completion of treatment. There were 3–4% increases in parotid mean doses, but no significant differences in dose metrics of GTV and other OARs. The changes were organ and patient dependent. Control charts for various dose metrics were generated to assess the metrics at each fraction for individual patient. Conclusions: Daily CBCT could be used to monitor dosimetric variations of targets and OARs resulting from volume changes and tissue deformation in oropharyngeal cancer radiotherapy. Treatment review with the guidance of a SPC tool allows for an objective and consistent clinical decision to apply adaptive radiotherapy.