An Analysis of Turkey's and BRICS' Voting Cohesion in the UN General Assembly during 2002–2014. Issue 2 (31st January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kurşun, Ali Murat; Parlar Dal, Emel
• Is Part Of: Global policy. Volume 8:Issue 2(2017)
• Page Start: 191
• Page End: 201
• Publication Date: 2017-01-31
• Subjects: Globalization -- Periodicals; International relations -- Periodicals; World politics -- Periodicals; 327.1705
• DOI: 10.1111/1758-5899.12405
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1758-5880

Abstract

Abstract: This paper attempts to analyze the voting behavior of Turkey in the UN General Assembly between 2002 and 2014 in comparison with those of the Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS) countries by using selected reference groups of India, Brazil, South Africa (IBSA), EU, permanent members of the UN Security Council (P5) and the Western group of P5 (USA, UK, France) with the help of a two layered methodology. In doing so, this paper, with a two‐layered quantitative and qualitative methodological model, empirically tests Turkey's voting alignments and cohesion scores in the UN General Assembly to provide a comparative perspective on the degree of foreign policy cohesion among Turkey and its BRICS peers by comparing the group and pair‐wise 'cohesion' results. Finally, this paper will qualitatively analyze and discuss Turkey's exceptional voting behaviors and alignments with both the Western group of P5 and the BRICS to understand the nature of the international issues leading to convergences or divisions between Turkey and the BRICS and to demonstrate Turkey's in‐between and dual foreign policy role in international affairs. Abstract : The two‐layered UNGA voting behavior measurement model employed in this study can also be applied to different group of countries such as MIKTA, Turkic states, Middle Eastern states, African countries and Balkan states to explore the current picture of convergence and divergence network of any country's foreign policy trajectories.