Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Based on Vector Similarity Measures under the Framework of Dual Hesitant Fuzzy Sets. (17th August 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Guirao, Juan Luis García; Sarwar Sindhu, M.; Rashid, Tabasam; Kashif, Agha
• Other Names: Papashinopoulos Garyfalos Academic Editor.
• Is Part Of: Discrete dynamics in nature and society. Volume 2020(2020)
• Publication Date: 2020-08-17
• Subjects: System analysis -- Periodicals; Dynamics -- Periodicals; Chaotic behavior in systems -- Periodicals; Differentiable dynamical systems -- Periodicals; 003.05
• DOI: 10.1155/2020/1425487
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1026-0226

Abstract

Abstract : Similarity measures have a great importance in the decision-making process. In order to identify the similarity between the options, many experts have established several types of similarity measures on the basis of vectors and distances. The Cosine, Dice, and Jaccard are the vector similarity measures. The present work enclosed the modified Jaccard and Dice similarity measures. Founded on the Dice and Jaccard similarity measures, we offered a multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) model under the dual hesitant fuzzy sets (DHFSs) situation, in which the appraised values of the alternatives with respect to criteria are articulated by dual hesitant fuzzy elements (DHFEs). Since the weights of the criteria have a much influence in making the decisions, therefore decision makers (DMs) allocate the weights to each criteria according to their knowledge. In the present work, we get rid of the doubt to allocate the weights to the criteria by taking an objective function under some constraints and then extended the linear programming (LP) technique to evaluate the weights of the criteria. The Dice and Jaccard weighted similarity measures are practiced amongst the ideal and each alternative to grade all the alternatives to get the best one. Eventually, two practical examples, about investment companies and selection of smart phone accessories are assumed to elaborate the efficiency of the proposed methodology.