To erase or not to erase, that is not the question: Drawing from observation in an analogue or digital environment. Issue 2 (1st October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Christie, John; Reichertz, Mathew; Maycock, Bryan; Klein, Raymond M.
• Is Part Of: Art, design & communication in higher education. Volume 19:Issue 2(2020)
• Page Start: 203
• Page End: 220
• Publication Date: 2020-10-01
• Subjects: Art -- Study and teaching (Higher) -- Periodicals; Design -- Study and teaching (Higher) -- Periodicals; Creative teaching -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 707.11
• DOI: 10.1386/adch_00023_1
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1474-273X

Abstract

Erasing when drawing occurs for a variety of reasons. While the most obvious may be correction of mistakes, at other times erasers are used to create such things as highlights or marks that introduce particular aesthetic elements. When a drawing is made on paper, partial erasure 'marks' can provide a useful record of a drawing's evolution. For the teacher, this historical record can be a catalyst for helpful commentary and criticism. While programmed to simulate an analogue eraser, in a digital environment the erase function can eradicate a drawing's history with a single click. We studied analogue and digital tool use behaviours (including erasing) to compare the frequency of erasure and the effect of erasing on observational accuracy in adults between the age of 17 and 64 with various levels of drawing experience from less than two years to more than ten years. The study involved participants making one drawing on paper with traditional drawing tools and one drawing on a digital drawing tablet. We then had the drawings rated for accuracy. Among other interesting results, we found that erasing occurs with greater frequency when participants work in a digital environment than in an analogue one and that, while there were significant tool use differences between the environments, those differences did not result in differences in the accuracy of final drawings indicating the adaptability of our participants using different means to achieve the same effect.