Current Use and Impact on 30-Day Mortality of Pulmonary Artery Catheter in Cardiogenic Shock Patients: Results From the CardShock Study. (December 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Current Use and Impact on 30-Day Mortality of Pulmonary Artery Catheter in Cardiogenic Shock Patients: Results From the CardShock Study. (December 2020)
- Main Title:
- Current Use and Impact on 30-Day Mortality of Pulmonary Artery Catheter in Cardiogenic Shock Patients: Results From the CardShock Study
- Authors:
- Sionis, Alessandro
Rivas-Lasarte, Mercedes
Mebazaa, Alexandre
Tarvasmäki, Tuukka
Sans-Roselló, Jordi
Tolppanen, Heli
Varpula, Marjut
Jurkko, Raija
Banaszewski, Marek
Silva-Cardoso, Jose
Carubelli, Valentina
Lindholm, Matias Greve
Parissis, John
Spinar, Jindrich
Lassus, Johan
Harjola, Veli-Pekka
Masip, Josep - Abstract:
- Background: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is the most life-threatening manifestation of acute heart failure. Its complexity and high in-hospital mortality may justify the need for invasive monitoring with a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). Methods: Patients with CS included in the CardShock Study, an observational, prospective, multicenter, European registry, were analyzed, aiming to describe the real-world use of PAC, evaluate its impact on 30-day mortality, and the ability of different hemodynamic parameters to predict outcomes. Results: Pulmonary artery catheter was used in 82 (37.4%) of the 219 patients. Cardiogenic shock patients who managed with a PAC received more frequently treatment with inotropes and vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and mechanical assist devices ( P < .01). Overall 30-day mortality was 36.5%. Pulmonary artery catheter use did not affect mortality even after propensity score matching analysis (hazard ratio = 1.17 [0.59-2.32], P = .66). Cardiac index, cardiac power index (CPI), and stroke volume index (SVI) showed the highest areas under the curve for 30-day mortality (ranging from 0.752-0.803) and allowed for a significant net reclassification improvement of 0.467 (0.083-1.180), 0.700 (0.185-1.282), 0.683 (0.168-1.141), respectively, when added to the CardShock risk score. Conclusions: In our contemporary cohort of CS, over one-third of patients were managed with a PAC. Pulmonary artery catheter use was associated with aBackground: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is the most life-threatening manifestation of acute heart failure. Its complexity and high in-hospital mortality may justify the need for invasive monitoring with a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). Methods: Patients with CS included in the CardShock Study, an observational, prospective, multicenter, European registry, were analyzed, aiming to describe the real-world use of PAC, evaluate its impact on 30-day mortality, and the ability of different hemodynamic parameters to predict outcomes. Results: Pulmonary artery catheter was used in 82 (37.4%) of the 219 patients. Cardiogenic shock patients who managed with a PAC received more frequently treatment with inotropes and vasopressors, mechanical ventilation, renal replacement therapy, and mechanical assist devices ( P < .01). Overall 30-day mortality was 36.5%. Pulmonary artery catheter use did not affect mortality even after propensity score matching analysis (hazard ratio = 1.17 [0.59-2.32], P = .66). Cardiac index, cardiac power index (CPI), and stroke volume index (SVI) showed the highest areas under the curve for 30-day mortality (ranging from 0.752-0.803) and allowed for a significant net reclassification improvement of 0.467 (0.083-1.180), 0.700 (0.185-1.282), 0.683 (0.168-1.141), respectively, when added to the CardShock risk score. Conclusions: In our contemporary cohort of CS, over one-third of patients were managed with a PAC. Pulmonary artery catheter use was associated with a more aggressive treatment strategy. Nevertheless, PAC use was not associated with 30-day mortality. Cardiac index, CPI, and SVI were the strongest 30-day mortality predictors on top of the previously validated CardShock risk score. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of intensive care medicine. Volume 35:Number 12(2020)
- Journal:
- Journal of intensive care medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 35:Number 12(2020)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 35, Issue 12 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 35
- Issue:
- 12
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0035-0012-0000
- Page Start:
- 1426
- Page End:
- 1433
- Publication Date:
- 2020-12
- Subjects:
- cardiogenic shock -- mortality -- pulmonary artery catheter -- cardiac index -- stroke volume index -- cardiac power index
Critical care medicine -- Periodicals
Critical Care -- Periodicals
Soins intensifs -- Périodiques
Soins intensifs
Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme)
Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme)
616.02805 - Journal URLs:
- http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0885-0666;screen=info;ECOIP ↗
http://jic.sagepub.com ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=jic ↗
http://www.sagepublications.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/0885066619828959 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0885-0666
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14285.xml