Screening everyday health information literacy among four populations. (3rd April 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hirvonen, Noora; Enwald, Heidi; Mayer, Anne‐Kathrin; Korpelainen, Raija; Pyky, Riitta; Salonurmi, Tuire; Savolainen, Markku J.; Nengomasha, Cathrine; Abankwah, Ruth; Uutoni, Wilhelm; Niemelä, Raimo; Huotari, Maija‐Leena
• Is Part Of: Health information and libraries journal. Volume 37:Number 3(2020:Sep.)
• Page Start: 192
• Page End: 203
• Publication Date: 2020-04-03
• Subjects: adolescents -- adults -- Africa, South -- consumer health information -- Europe, Northern -- health literacy -- higher education -- information literacy; Medical libraries -- Periodicals; Public health libraries -- Periodicals; Life sciences libraries -- Periodicals; Medical libraries -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; Public health libraries -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; Information science -- Periodicals; 026.61094105
• DOI: 10.1111/hir.12304
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1471-1834

Abstract

Abstract: Background: People face varying obstacles when interacting with health information in their everyday lives. Objectives: This study aims to examine the applicability of a multidimensional Everyday Health Information Literacy (EHIL) screening tool in detecting people with challenges in accessing, understanding, evaluating and using health information in everyday situations. Methods: Previously collected EHIL screening tool data from Finnish upper secondary school students ( n = 217), Finnish young men ( n = 1450), Finnish adults with an increased risk for metabolic syndrome ( n = 559) and Namibian university students ( n = 271) were reanalysed to examine the factorial structure of the tool and to compare the groups. Statistical analyses included exploratory factor analyses, calculation of mean factor scores and one‐way analysis of variance. Results: A three factor structure ('awareness', 'access', 'assessment') for the screening tool was supported based on the Finnish samples. However, the Namibian data did not follow a similar structure. Significant differences in groupwise factor scores were discovered. Discussion: The findings suggest that the multidimensional EHIL screening tool can be used in pointing out areas where individuals or groups may need support. Conclusion: The tool may be useful to health information and library services workers when counselling or educating the public.