RA04.01: PRONE POSITION IN THORACOSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY IMPROVES POSTOPERATIVE OXYGENATION AND REDUCES PULMONARY COMPLICATIONS. (14th September 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kakeji, Yoshihiro; Otsubo, Dai; Takiguchi, Gosuke; Oshikiri, Taro; Nakamura, Tetsu
• Is Part Of: Diseases of the esophagus. Volume 31(2018)Supplement 1
• Page Start: 24
• Page End: 25
• Publication Date: 2018-09-14
• Subjects: Thoracoscopic esophagectomy -- prone position -- postoperative oxygenation -- pulmonary complication; Esophagus -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.32
• DOI: 10.1093/dote/doy089.RA04.01
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1120-8694

Abstract

Abstract: Background: While thoracoscopic esophagectomy is a widely performed surgical procedure, only few studies regarding the influence of body position on changes in circulation and breathing, after the surgery, have been reported. This study aimed at evaluating the effect of body position, during surgery, on the postoperative breathing functions of the chest. Methods: A total of 266 patients who underwent right-sided transthoracic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer from 2004 to 2012 were included in this study. Fifty-four of them underwent open thoracotomies in the left lateral decubitus position (Group O), 108 underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the left lateral decubitus position (Group L) and 104 patients were treated by thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position (Group P). Two patients in Group P, who presented with intra-operative bleeding and underwent thoracotomy, were subsequently excluded from the pulmonary function analysis. Results: Two patients in Group P had to be changed from the prone position to the lateral decubitus position and underwent thoracotomy in order to control intra-operative bleeding. Despite the significantly longer chest operation period in Group P, total blood loss was significantly lower in this group when compared to Groups O and L. Furthermore, patients in Group P presented with significantly lower water balance during the perioperative period and markedly higher SpO2/FiO2 ratio after the surgery. The incidence of respiratory complications was significantly higher in Group O when compared to the other two groups; however, no significant differences were observed between the Groups L and P. Conclusion: From a surgical point of view, artificial pneumothorax and gravity improves the operative field view in the prone position without any compression of the right lung, thereby resulting in no mechanical damage to the lungs. Prone position esophagectomy is a useful surgical technique, which appears to preserve the postoperative pulmonary function. The patients are able to endure the surgical procedure and present with less respiratory complications. Disclosure: All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.