Performance verification of anti-SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody detection by using four chemiluminescence immunoassay systems. (November 2020)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Performance verification of anti-SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody detection by using four chemiluminescence immunoassay systems. (November 2020)
- Main Title:
- Performance verification of anti-SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody detection by using four chemiluminescence immunoassay systems
- Authors:
- Wan, Yafang
Li, Zhijie
Wang, Kun
Li, Tian
Liao, Pu - Abstract:
- Objectives: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the analytical performance of seven kits for detecting IgM/IgG antibodies against coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) by using four chemiluminescence immunoassay systems. Methods: Fifty patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection and 130 controls without coronavirus infection from the General Hospital of Chongqing were enrolled in the current retrospective study. Four chemiluminescence immunoassay systems, including seven IgM/IgG antibody detection kits for SARS-CoV-2 (A_IgM, A_IgG, B_IgM, B_IgG, C_IgM, C_IgG and D_Ab), were employed to detect antibody concentrations. The chi-square test, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Youden's index were determined to verify the cut-off value of each detection system. Results: The repeatability verification results of the A, B, C and D systems are all qualified. D_Ab performed best (92% sensitivity and 99.23% specificity), and B_IgM performed worse than the other systems. Except for the A_IgM and C_IgG systems, the optimal diagnostic thresholds and cut-off values of the other kits and their recommendations are inconsistent with each other. B_IgM had the worst AUC, and C_IgG had the best diagnostic accuracy. More importantly, the B_IgG system had the highest false-positive rate for testing patients with AIDS, tumours and pregnancies. The A_IgM system test showed the highest false-positive rates among elderly individuals over 90 years old. COVID-2019 IgM/IgG antibodyObjectives: The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the analytical performance of seven kits for detecting IgM/IgG antibodies against coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) by using four chemiluminescence immunoassay systems. Methods: Fifty patients diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection and 130 controls without coronavirus infection from the General Hospital of Chongqing were enrolled in the current retrospective study. Four chemiluminescence immunoassay systems, including seven IgM/IgG antibody detection kits for SARS-CoV-2 (A_IgM, A_IgG, B_IgM, B_IgG, C_IgM, C_IgG and D_Ab), were employed to detect antibody concentrations. The chi-square test, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and Youden's index were determined to verify the cut-off value of each detection system. Results: The repeatability verification results of the A, B, C and D systems are all qualified. D_Ab performed best (92% sensitivity and 99.23% specificity), and B_IgM performed worse than the other systems. Except for the A_IgM and C_IgG systems, the optimal diagnostic thresholds and cut-off values of the other kits and their recommendations are inconsistent with each other. B_IgM had the worst AUC, and C_IgG had the best diagnostic accuracy. More importantly, the B_IgG system had the highest false-positive rate for testing patients with AIDS, tumours and pregnancies. The A_IgM system test showed the highest false-positive rates among elderly individuals over 90 years old. COVID-2019 IgM/IgG antibody test systems exhibit performance differences. Conclusions: The Innodx Biotech Total Antibody serum diagnosis kit is the most reliable detection system for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, which can be used together with nucleic acid tests as an alternative method for SARS-CoV-2 detecting. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Annals of clinical biochemistry. Volume 57:Number 6(2020:Nov.)
- Journal:
- Annals of clinical biochemistry
- Issue:
- Volume 57:Number 6(2020:Nov.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 57, Issue 6 (2020)
- Year:
- 2020
- Volume:
- 57
- Issue:
- 6
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2020-0057-0006-0000
- Page Start:
- 429
- Page End:
- 434
- Publication Date:
- 2020-11
- Subjects:
- COVID-19 -- SARS-CoV-2 -- antibody -- chemiluminescence immunoassay -- performance verification
Clinical chemistry -- Periodicals
Clinical biochemistry -- Periodicals
616.075 - Journal URLs:
- http://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/detail?sid=810a7788-77dd-439f-9630-ad7f5b199fd3%40sessionmgr4&vid=1&hid=14&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl#db=mnh&jid=0324055 ↗
http://acb.rsmjournals.com ↗
http://www.usc.edu/hsc/nml/e-resources/info/annclib.html ↗
http://www.uk.sagepub.com/home.nav ↗
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/rsm/acb ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1177/0004563220963847 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0004-5632
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 14272.xml