Prone cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A scoping and expanded grey literature review for the COVID-19 pandemic. (October 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Douma, Matthew J.; MacKenzie, Ella; Loch, Tess; Tan, Maria C.; Anderson, Dustin; Picard, Christopher; Milovanovic, Lazar; O'Dochartaigh, Domhnall; Brindley, Peter G.
• Is Part Of: Resuscitation. Volume 155(2020)
• Page Start: 103
• Page End: 111
• Publication Date: 2020-10
• Subjects: CPR -- Prone -- Cardiopulmonary resuscitation -- Scoping review -- Resuscitation -- COVID-19 -- SARS-CoV-2; Resuscitation -- Periodicals; Resuscitation -- Periodicals; Réanimation -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 616.025
• DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.07.010
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0300-9572

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: To identify and summarize the available science on prone resuscitation. To determine the value of undertaking a systematic review on this topic; and to identify knowledge gaps to aid future research, education and guidelines. Methods: This review was guided by specific methodological framework and reporting items (PRISMA-ScR). We included studies, cases and grey literature regarding prone position and CPR/cardiac arrest. The databases searched were MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus and Google Scholar. Expanded grey literature searching included internet search engine, targeted websites and social media. Results: Of 453 identified studies, 24 (5%) studies met our inclusion criteria. There were four prone resuscitation-relevant studies examining: blood and tidal volumes generated by prone compressions; prone compression quality metrics on a manikin; and chest computed tomography scans for compression landmarking. Twenty case reports/series described the resuscitation of 25 prone patients. Prone compression quality was assessed by invasive blood pressure monitoring, exhaled carbon dioxide and pulse palpation. Recommended compression location was zero-to-two vertebral segments below the scapulae. Twenty of 25 cases (80%) survived prone resuscitation, although few cases reported long term outcome (neurological status at hospital discharge). Seven cases described full neurological recovery. Conclusion: This scoping review did not identify sufficient evidence to justify a systematic review or modified resuscitation guidelines. It remains reasonable to initiate resuscitation in the prone position if turning the patient supine would lead to delays or risk to providers or patients. Prone resuscitation quality can be judged using end-tidal CO2, and arterial pressure tracing, with patients turned supine if insufficient.