Conceptions of national identity and opposition to bicultural policies in New Zealand: A comparison of majority and minority perspectives. (September 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Devos, Thierry; Yogeeswaran, Kumar; Milojev, Petar; Sibley, Chris G.
• Is Part Of: International journal of intercultural relations. Volume 78(2020)
• Page Start: 33
• Page End: 42
• Publication Date: 2020-09
• Subjects: National identity -- Biculturalism -- Policy -- Social status -- Majority vs. minority; Intercultural communication -- Periodicals; Cultural relations -- Periodicals; Cross-cultural studies -- Periodicals; Communication interculturelle -- Périodiques; Relations culturelles -- Périodiques; Études transculturelles -- Périodiques; Cross-cultural studies; Cultural relations; Intercultural communication; Periodicals; 303.482
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.04.004
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0147-1767

Abstract

Abstract: Using a nationally representative sample, the present research tested whether conceptions of national identity differentially predicted attitudes toward bicultural policies among New Zealanders of European, Māori, Asian, and Pacific descent. A series of multi-group structural equation models revealed that among members of the majority group and all minority groups, endorsement of a civic conception of national identity (i.e., respecting political institutions and laws) was related to opposition to resource policies, but such a relationship was especially strong among the majority group. By contrast, endorsement of an ethnic conception of national identity (i.e., having Māori or European ancestry) was related to support for resource and symbolic policies among minority group members, but to opposition to the same policies among the majority group. The present work documents that belonging to a majority vs. minority group moderates the relations between conceptions of national identity (civic vs. ethnic) and support or opposition to specific bicultural policies. In addition, some elements of civic conceptions of national identity may legitimize inequalities rather than reduce them.